Parenting styles and fertility intention: Mediating effects of childbearing beliefs and psychological resilience

Zhongxuan Huang, Liyuan Chen, Mengyuan Zhang, Lixuan Huang, Xuan Liu, Jinrun Chen, Yi Zheng, Xiaoyi Wu, Huanran Liao, Hailan Wang, Yanhui Gao, Fan Zhang

Abstract

China’s declining fertility rate is partly due to low fertility intention among childbearing population. To understand family influence on young people’s fertility intention and its underlying mechanisms, this study examines how parenting styles (authoritarian vs. permissive) affect Chinese college students’ fertility intention, with traditional childbearing beliefs and resilience as mediators. Data were collected from 839 participants (Age: M = 21.1, SD = 1.7 years) using structured questionnaires. Logistic regression found that a positive correlation between permissive parenting style and fertility intention, with authoritarian parenting having no impact. Mediation analysis showed the association between permissive parenting style and fertility intention was fully mediated through resilience (b = 0.0, 95%CI = [0.0,0.1]) and greater childbearing beliefs (b = 0.0, 95%CI = [0.0,0.1]). The findings indicate that permissive parenting is related to higher fertility intention in youth via resilience and childbearing beliefs. Promoting positive family environments and permissive parenting may enhance childbearing intention

Full Text:

PDF

References

China NBoSo: China Statistical Yearbook. In.: China Statistics Press; 2024.

Fertility Rate [https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate]

Morgan SP, Zhigang G, Hayford SR: China's below‐replacement fertility: Recent trends and future prospects. Population & development review 2009; 35(3):605-629.

Qiao P, Li Y, Song Y, Tian X: Female university students’ fertility intentions and their psychosocial factors. BMC Public Health 2024; 24(1):685.

Xu J, Li L, Ma X-Q, Zhang M, Qiao J, Redding SR, Wang R, Ouyang Y-Q: Fertility intentions, parenting attitudes, and fear of childbirth among college students in China: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 2023; 36(1):65-71.

Zhang C, Wei L, Zhu Y, Teng L, Zhang W, Xu J, Qin M, Jiang N, Alias H, Wong LP: Fertility intentions among young people in the era of China’s three–child policy: a national survey of university students. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2022; 22(1):637.

Morgan SP, Taylor MG: Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Sociol 2006; 32(1):375-399.

Hashemzadeh M, Shariati M, Mohammad Nazari A, Keramat A: Childbearing intention and its associated factors: A systematic review. Nursing open 2021; 8(5):2354-2368.

Sørensen NO, Marcussen S, Backhausen MG, Juhl M, Schmidt L, Tydén T, Hegaard HK: Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students. Reproductive health 2016; 13:1-10.

Baumrind D: The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The journal of early adolescence 1991; 11(1):56-95.

Oppenheimer CW, Hankin BL, Young J: Effect of parenting and peer stressors on cognitive vulnerability and risk for depression among youth. Journal of abnormal child psychology 2018; 46(3):597-612.

Martinez I, Garcia F, Veiga F, Garcia OF, Rodrigues Y, Serra E: Parenting styles, internalization of values and self-esteem: A cross-cultural study in Spain, Portugal and Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 2020; 17(7):2370.

Llorca A, Cristina Richaud M, Malonda E: Parenting, peer relationships, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement: Direct and mediating effects. Frontiers in Psychology 2017; 8:2120.

Levin E: Baumrind’s Parenting Styles. In: Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. edn. Edited by Goldstein S, Naglieri JA. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2011: 213-215.

Hawkins SM: The influence of parenting styles on the development of moral judgment in college level adolescents. 2005.

BR S, Raman V: Influence of parental personality on parenting styles: A scoping review of literature. International Journal of Psychology Sciences 2021.

Manuel L: Relationship of personal authoritarianism with parenting styles. Psychological reports 2006; 98(1):193-198.

Reifen Tagar M, Federico CM, Lyons KE, Ludeke S, Koenig MA: Heralding the authoritarian? Orientation toward authority in early childhood. Psychological science 2014; 25(4):883-892.

Vogl TS, Freese J: Differential fertility makes society more conservative on family values. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2020; 117(14):7696-7701.

Beaujouan E, Solaz A: Is the family size of parents and children still related? Revisiting the cross-generational relationship over the last century. Demography 2019; 56(2):595-619.

Lansford JE, Pettit GS, Rauer A, Vandenberg CE, Schulenberg JE, Staff J, Jager J, Dodge KA, Bates JE: Intergenerational continuity and stability in early family formation. Journal of Family Psychology 2019; 33(3):370.

Xu Y, Farver JA, Zhang Z, Zeng Q, Yu L, Cai B: Mainland Chinese parenting styles and parent-child interaction. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2005; 29(6):524-531.

Zhuang Y, Jiang Y, Li B: Fertility intention and related factors in China: findings from the 2017 National Fertility Survey. China Population & Development Studies 2020; 4:114-126.

Qiu Z, Guo Y, Wang J, Zhang H: Associations of parenting style and resilience with depression and anxiety symptoms in chinese middle school students. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13:897339.

Frias-Armenta M, McCloskey LA: Determinants of harsh parenting in Mexico. Journal of abnormal child psychology 1998; 26:129-139.

Verdolini N, Amoretti S, Montejo L, García-Rizo C, Hogg B, Mezquida G, Rabelo-da-Ponte FD, Vallespir C, Radua J, Martinez-Aran A: Resilience and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of affective disorders 2021; 283:156-164.

Gatta A, Mattioli F, Mencarini L, Vignoli D: Employment uncertainty and fertility intentions: Stability or resilience? Population Studies 2022; 76(3):387-406.

Tu W-J, Zeng X, Liu Q: Aging tsunami coming: the main finding from China’s seventh national population census. Aging clinical & experimental research 2022; 34(5):1159-1163.

Mu L: The Compilation of Chinese Parenting Style Scale and its Reliability and Validity Analysis. Master Wannan Medical College 2014.

Mueller T: Development and testing of the university student resilience scale. Journal of American College Health 2023; 71(3):967-972.

Bailey KD: Methods of social research: Simon and Schuster; 2008.

Guo M: Research on the Reproductive Behavior of Professional Women of Childbearing Age in Xi 'an under the Background of Low Fertility rate. Master Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology 2021.

Miettinen A, Paajanen P: Value orientations and fertility intentions of Finnish men and women. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 2003:201-226.

Harland P, Reijneveld SA, Brugman E, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Verhulst FC: Family factors and life events as risk factors for behavioural and emotional problems in children. European child & adolescent psychiatry 2002; 11(4):176-184.

Peng R, Mou W, Xu P: Factors associated with fertility intention among Chinese married youth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral Sciences 2023; 13(2):184.

Arendt F, Markiewitz A, Mestas M, Scherr S: COVID-19 pandemic, government responses, and public mental health: Investigating consequences through crisis hotline calls in two countries. Social Science & Medicine 2020; 265:113532.

Yu; S, Huang; Z, Zhong; S, Minghsuan Su1 PT, Chong; SOK, Zhang F: How social isolation affects mating preferences among college students. Current Psychology under review.

Rijken AJ, Liefbroer AC: Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population studies 2009; 63(1):71-85.

Bi X, Yang Y, Li H, Wang M, Zhang W, Deater-Deckard K: Parenting styles and parent–adolescent relationships: The mediating roles of behavioral autonomy and parental authority. Frontiers in psychology 2018; 9:2187.

Ji Y, Chen F, Cai Y, Zheng Z: Do parents matter? Intergenerational ties and fertility preferences in a low-fertility context. Chinese Journal of Sociology 2015; 1(4):485-514.

Zhai Y, Liu K, Zhang L, Gao H, Chen Z, Du S, Zhang L, Guo Y: The relationship between post-traumatic symptoms, parenting style, and resilience among adolescents in Liaoning, China: A cross-sectional study. PloS one 2015; 10(10):e0141102.

Ugese JI, Ifelunwa O, Mgbeanuli CC, Ugwuowo CN, Joseph OO, Mallo SI, Chukwuemeka WI: Parenting style as predictors of psychological well-being of students of Nigerian Defence Academy Staff School Kaduna. Wukari International Studies Journal 2024; 8(2):55-64.

Du Y, Dang Q, Zhang B, Wu R, Rasool A: The effects of parenting differences on psychological resilience in adolescent students: The role of gratitude. Children & Youth Services Review 2021; 130:106224.

Kaniušonytė G, Laursen B: Perceptions of positive parenting predict increases in resilience for low neurotic and high agreeable adolescents. Personality and individual differences 2022; 185:111272.

Quan S, Li M, Yang X, Song H, Wang Z: Perceived parental emotional warmth and prosocial behaviors among emerging adults: Personal belief in a just world and gratitude as mediators. Journal of Child & Family Studies 2022:1-11.

Kane D, Li K: Fertility cultures and childbearing desire after the two-child policy: evidence from southwest China. Journal of Family Studies 2023; 29(2):576-594.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.