1. Home
  2. Vol 29, No 12s (2025)
  3. Peng

Reproductive health financing for flood-displaced women: A systematic review

Dongli Peng(1), Atiqah B. fayyaz(2), Shafei M. Hali(3), Hassan J. Shah(4),


(1) School of business, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, Jiangsu ,214000, China
(2) Research Coordinator- CFP
(3) Department of Government and Public Policy National Defence University Islamabad, Pakistan
(4) Jinnah School of Public Policy and leadership, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Pakistan is one of the top ten countries most vulnerable to climate-induced disasters, where frequent floods have displaced millions and disrupted essential services, particularly healthcare. Women of reproductive age are the most affected, facing limited access to basic sexual and reproductive health and rights  (SRHR) services, including antenatal care, safe delivery, family planning, and menstrual hygiene. Despite these critical needs, SRHR remains consistently underfunded in humanitarian responses, reflecting ongoing neglect in disaster risk reduction and health system planning. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review on SRHR financing for flood-displaced women in Pakistan, focusing on the 2010 and 2022 floods. Results, thematically coded, are cross-referenced with peer-reviewed studies, government policies, and reports from humanitarian agencies (UNFPA, WHO, NDMA), highlighting gaps in service delivery, financial allocation, and policy integration. The analysis reveals a fragmented response: NGOs often provide SRHR services without state coordination; planning lacks gender sensitivity; and support ends after short-term emergency phases. The study underscores the structural absence of displaced women’s SRHR in both financing and policy frameworks. To address these gaps, the paper recommends gender-responsive health financing, integration of SRHR into disaster preparedness plans, and establishment of sustainable funding streams to protect women’s health rights during crises

References


Germanwatch. Global Climate Risk Index 2021. Bonn: Germanwatch; 2021. Available from: https://www.germanwatch.org

World Bank. Pakistan floods 2010: Damage and needs assessment. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2011. Available from: https://documents.worldbank.org

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA). Pakistan 2022 Floods Response Plan. Geneva: UN OCHA; 2022. Available from: https://reliefweb.int

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Pakistan floods: Reproductive health and protection updates. New York: UNFPA; 2022. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org

National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA). 2022 Flood Response Report. Islamabad: NDMA; 2022. Available from: https://www.ndma.gov.pk

Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG). Inter-Agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings. Geneva: IAWG; 2019. Available from: https://iawg.net

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J and Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.

Delaney PL and Shrader E. Gender and post-disaster reconstruction: The case of hurricane Mitch in Honduras and Nicaragua. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2000.

KC A, Gurung R and Kinney MV. Effect of earthquake on maternal and child health services in Nepal. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2): S48.

Chynoweth S. Advancing reproductive health on the humanitarian agenda: The 2012–2014 global review. Confl Health. 2015;9(Suppl 1): I1.

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). MISP Readiness Assessment Toolkit. New York: UNFPA; 2020. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org

Ayesha S, Khattak UK and Junaid K. Reproductive health service disruptions during climate emergencies in Pakistan: A policy and practice gap. J Glob Health Rep. 2022;6: e2022012.

National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS), ICF. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Islamabad and Rockville (MD): NIPS and ICF; 2019. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com

Kirsch TD, Wadhwani C, Sauer L, Doocy S and Catlett C. Impact of the 2010 Pakistan floods on rural and urban populations at six months. PLoS Curr. 2012;4.

Hadi S. Gender and disaster response in Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities. J Int Womens Stud. 2013;14(1):185–98.

Mahmood A, Iqbal M and Khan N. Flood impact on reproductive health services in Pakistan. Pak J Public Health. 2012;2(2):46–50.

UN Women. Gendered impact assessment: Pakistan floods 2022. Bangkok: UN Women Asia and the Pacific; 2022. Available from: https://asiapacific.unwomen.org

International Rescue Committee (IRC). Pakistan floods: Humanitarian response and protection update. New York: IRC; 2022. Available from: https://www.rescue.org

Saeed A, Bibi R and Memon H. Gender-based vulnerabilities in flood response: Evidence from Sindh. Asian J Soc Sci Stud. 2023;8(2):14–22.

Bekker LG, Alleyne G, Baral S, Cepeda J, Daskalakis D, Dowdy D, Dybul M, Eholie S, Esom K, Garnett G and Grimsrud A. Advancing global health and strengthening the HIV response in the era of the Sustainable Development Goals: The International AIDS Society-Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2018;392(10144):312–58.

Austrian K, Abuya T, Kangwana B, Wado YD and Maluccio J. Adolescents and COVID-19: Emerging impacts on health, nutrition, and well-being. Nairobi: Population Council; 2021.

Khan R and Ejaz A. Gender budgeting in Pakistan: Myths, realities, and the way forward. Lahore J Econ. 2020;25(1):67–88.

National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA). Pakistan Monsoon Contingency Plan. Islamabad: NDMA; 2021.

Ministry of Finance. Budget in Brief FY 2023–24. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan; 2023.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). Pakistan: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment – 2022 Floods. Manila: ADB; 2023. Available from: https://www.adb.org

Rahim S, Ali T and Batool Z. Missing women in climate policy: A critical assessment of Pakistan’s flood response. Environ Justice. 2022;15(4):120–9.

Holvoet N and Inberg L. Gender budgeting and its effectiveness in fragile contexts: Case study of Nepal. Public Adm Dev. 2014;34(1):1–15.

Sharma G, Shrestha S and Mainali A. Integrating reproductive health in post-disaster recovery: Lessons from Nepal. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(2):236–43.

Mahmud S, Kabir H and Hossain M. Community-based disaster preparedness for reproductive health in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(3):358–67.

Bhandari R, Gurung S and Shrestha B. Reproductive health service delivery after Nepal’s 2015 earthquake: A mixed-methods study. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):1–10.

Deligero JL, Ballada JR and Reyes C. Mainstreaming reproductive health in the Philippines’ disaster response. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018; 28:847–55.

Save the Children. Girls in crisis: Period poverty and health risks in Pakistan’s floods. London: Save the Children; 2023. Available from: https://www.savethechildren.org

Ministry of Climate Change. Pakistan Monsoon Emergency Framework. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan; 2023.

Malik A and Malik ZA. Gender inequality in disaster response budgets: The case of Pakistan. Dev Pract. 2020;30(2):222–30.

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Reproductive health services for flood-affected women: post-2010 update. New York: UNFPA; 2011.

Baloch A, Malik M and Zaman M. Gaps in humanitarian coordination during floods: A case study from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pak J Public Health. 2021;11(2):76–82.

GAVI Alliance. Leveraging public-private partnerships for health resilience in LMICs. Geneva: GAVI; 2022. Available from: https://www.gavi.org.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 431 times
PDF Download : 185 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.