1. Home
  2. Vol 26, No 1 (2022)
  3. Bayoumi

The impact of pharaonic female genital mutilation on sexuality: Two cases from Sudan highlighting the need for widespread dissemination of sexual and reproductive health education in Africa

Rasha R. Bayoumi(1), Jacky Boivin(2),


(1) Takemi Fellow, Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University and University of Birmingham Dubai
(2) Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University
Corresponding Author

Abstract


It is well documented that female genital mutilation (FGM) can have numerous physical and psychosocial consequences. The increased awareness about FGM and its impact on female health over the past few decades has led to a ban on FGM in many countries, however, this has yet to translate into measurable changes in prevalence. Efforts to enforce legislation have been unsuccessful in part because the general public lacks information about the negative consequences of FGM. In this report we present two cases of sexual difficulties as a result of FGM from Sudan, where the most severe form of FGM is still being practiced. During an interview about infertility, these two women volunteered information about how FGM has affected their sexuality. The lack of information about the impact of FGM on sexuality reflected in these cases, highlighted the significant need for widespread dissemination of sexual and reproductive health education in Africa. (Afr J Reprod Health 2022; 26[1]: 110-114).

References


World Health Organization. Prevalence of female genital

mutilation. [WHO website]. 2020. https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-andreproductive-health-and-research/areas-ofwork/female-genital-mutilation/prevalence-offemale-genitalmutilation#:~:text=It%20is%20estimated%20that%20more,female%20genital%20mutilation%20every%20year. Accessed February 21, 2021.

Toubia NF and Sharief EH. Female genital mutilation: have

we made progress? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 82(3): 251-61.

Yoder PS and Khan S. Numbers of Women Circumcised in

Africa: The Production of a Total. DHS Working Papers No. 39. 2008. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International

World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation. Fact

sheet No241, [WHO website]. 2020. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/. Accessed February 21, 2021.

World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive

Health Research (RHR) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Female genital mutilation (issue No. 12.41). [WHO website]. 2012. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77428/1/WHO_RHR_12.41_eng.pdf Accessed February 21,

Obermeyer CM. The consequences of female circumcision

for health and sexuality: an update on the evidence. Cult Health Sex 2005; 7(5): 443-61.

Reisel D and Creighton SM. Long term health consequences

of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Maturitas 2015; 80(1): 48-51.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Female

Genital Mutilation and its Management (Green-top Guideline No. 53). 2015, 1-26.

Fahmy A, El-Mouelhy MT and Ragab AR. Female genital

mutilation/cutting and issues of sexuality in Egypt. Reprod Health Matters 2010; 18(36): 181-90.

Berggren V, Ahmed SM, Hernlund Y, Johansson E,

Habbani B and Edberg AK. Being victims or beneficiaries? Perspectives on female genital cutting and reinfibulation in Sudan. Afr J Reprod Health 2006 Aug;10(2):24-36.

Ahmed HM, Shabu SA and Shabila NP. A qualitative

assessment of women’s perspectives and experience of female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan Region. BMC Women's Health; 2019, 19: 66

Obiora OL, Maree JE and Nkosi-Mafutha NG. Experiences of young women who underwent female genital mutilation/cutting. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29(21-22): 4104-4115.

Bayoumi RR, van der Poel S and Boivin J. Determining

the need for fertility care and the acceptability and feasibility of administering a fertility awareness tool from the user’s perspective in a sample of Sudanese infertility patients. 2021. Manuscript in review at Reprod Biomed Soc Online.

Rowe, P.J., Comhaire, F.H., Hargreave, T.B., Mellows

H.J. and World Health Organization. (1993). WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile couple. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/36983

Bayoumi RR, van der Poel S, El Samani EZ and Boivin J.

An evaluation of comprehensiveness, feasibility and acceptability of a fertility awareness educational tool. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2018, 6: 10-21.

World Health Organization. HRP ANNUAL REPORT 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (WHO/RHR/HRP/19.3). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Andersson S, Rymer J, Joyce D, Momoh C and Gayle C.

Sexual quality of life in women who have undergone female genital mutilation: a case–control study. BJOG 2012; 119: 1606-1611.

Elneil S. Female sexual dysfunction in female genital mutilation, Tropical Doctor 2016; 46(1): 2-11

Esho T, Kimani S, Nyamongo I, Kimani V, Muniu S, Kigondu C, Ndavi1 P and Guyo J. The ‘heat’ goes away: sexual disorders of married women with female genital mutilation/cutting in Kenya. Reproductive Health 2017; 14: 164

Center for Reproductive Rights. Fact Sheet. Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Legal Prohibitions Worldwide. 2009.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 1036 times
PDF Download : 344 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.