A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of dinoprostone in full term pregnancy labor induction
), Fangbin Lai(2), Qiwei Lin(3), Yu Zhang(4),
(1) Department of Obstetrics,Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, ZhangZhhou, 353000, China
(2) Department of Obstetrics,Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, ZhangZhhou, 353000, China
(3) Department of Obstetrics,Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, ZhangZhhou, 353000, China
(4) Department of Obstetrics,Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, ZhangZhhou, 353000, China
Corresponding Author
Abstract
References
Abdelaziz A., Mahmoud A.A., Ellaithy M.I., Salem H.F.and
Mostafa A.A.. Pre-induction cervical ripening using
two different dinoprostone vaginal preparations: A
randomized clinical trial of tablets and slow release
retrievable insert. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2018
Aug;57(4):560-566.
Bakker R, Pierce S and Myers D. The role of prostaglandins
E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in
cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a
mechanistic approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017
Aug;296(2):167-179.
Barrilleaux P.S.Bofill J.A., Terrone D.A., Magann
E.F.andMorrison J.C.. Cervical ripening and
induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone
gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3
techniques.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002
Jun;186(6):1124-9.
Chang CH and Chang FM. Randomized comparison of
misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction
cervical ripening and labor induction. J Formos
Med Assoc 1997 May;96(5):366-9.
Chitrakar NS. Comparison of Misoprostol versus
Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening
at-term. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2012
Jan;10(1):10-5.
Denoual-Ziad C, Aicardi-Nicolas S, Creveuil C, Diemunsch
P.and Diguet A.. Impact of prolonged dinoprostone
cervical ripening on the rate of artificial induction
of labor: a prospective study of 330 patients. J
Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015 Mar;41(3):370-6.
Itoh H, Ishii K, Shigeta N, Yoshida K, Yamamoto S, Hirota N,
Saeki M, Sakamoto H and Nomura T. Efficacy and
safety of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal
delivery system (PROPESS) in Japanese pregnant
women requiring cervical ripening: Results from a
multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo
controlled phase III study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res
Jan;47(1):216-225.
Marconi AM, Bozzetti P, Morabito A, Perletti L and
Battagliarin G. Comparing two dinoprostone agents
for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a
randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Jun;138(2):135-40.
Neiger R and Greaves PC. Comparison between vaginal
misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical
ripening and labor induction. Tenn Med 2001
Jan;94(1):25-7.
Saxena P, Puri M, Bajaj M, Yadav M and Soni A. A
randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of
different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with
intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and
labor induction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011
Jul;15(7):759-63.
Sparrow MJ, Tait JD and Stone PR. Vaginal dinoprostone
versus oral misoprostol for predilatation of the
cervix in first trimester surgical abortion. Aust N Z
J Obstet Gynaecol 1998 Feb;38(1):64-8.
Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G and Paul RH. A comparison
of
intermittent
vaginal
administration
of
misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for
cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1997 Sep;177(3):612-8.
Bartha JL, Comino-Delgado R, Garcia-Benasach F and
Hervias-Vivancos B. Oral misoprostol and
intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and
labor induction: a randomized comparison. Obstet
Gynecol 2000 Sep;96(3):465-9.
Bolnick JM, Velazquez MD, Gonzalez JL and Willms D,
Miller H.Randomized trial between two active labor
management protocols in the presence of an
unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004
Jan;190(1):124-8.
De Bonrostro Torralba C, Tejero Cabrejas EL, Envid Lázaro
BM, Albert GJ and Lapuente SH Low-dose vaginal
misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for
induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized
trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019 Jul;98(7):913-919.
Garry D, Figueroa R, Kalish RB, McGahan MJ and Maulik
D.Randomized controlled trial of vaginal
misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for
labor induction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003
Apr;13(4):254-9.
Meyer M, Pflum J and Howard D. Outpatient misoprostol
compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction
cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol 2005 Mar;105(3):466-72.
Nunes F, Rodrigues R and Meirinho M. Randomized
comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and
dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of
labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999 Sep;181(3):626
Papanikolaou EG, Plachouras N, Drougia A, Andronikou S,
Vlachou C, Paraskevaidis E and Lolis D. Comparison
of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective
induction of labour in nulliparous women at full
term: a randomized prospective study. Reprod Biol
Endocrinol 2004 Sep 27;2:70.
Rozenberg P., Chevret S., Goffinet F., Durand-Zaleski I. and
Ville Y. Induction of labour with a viable infant: a
randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal
misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone. BJOG.
Dec;108(12):1255-62.
Sanchez-Ramos L., Peterson D.E., Delke I., Gaudier F.L.
Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol
compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a
randomized
trial.
Mar;91(3):401-5.
Obstet
Gynecol
Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G and Paul RH. A comparison
of
intermittent
vaginal
administration
of
misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for
cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1997 Sep;177(3):612-8.
Young DC, Delaney T, Armson BA, Caddick R, Hounsome
L and Hewitt M. Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal
misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor
induction: Randomized controlled trial. PLoS One
Jan 10;15(1):e0227245.
Agarwal N, Gupta A, Kriplani A, Bhatla N, Wadhwa L and
Arora R. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus
intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and
labor induction. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2003
Jun;29(3):147-51.
Ashour ASA, El Sharkawy M, Ali AS, Hosni AA, Torky HA
and Youssef EE. Comparative Efficacy of Vaginal
Misoprostol vs Vaginal Dinoprostone Administered
Hours Prior to Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized
Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020
Oct;33(5):559-565.
Ayaz A, Shaukat S, Farooq MU, Nasir M, Bano S and Faisal
A. Induction of labor: a comparative study of
intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone. Taiwan
J Obstet Gynecol 2010 Jun;49(2):151-5.
Belfrage P, Smedvig E, Gjessing L, Henriksen T, Koss KS,
Hertzberg T and Heimstad RA randomized
prospective study of misoprostol and dinoproston
for induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Dec;79(12):1065-8.
Chuck FJ andHuffaker BJ. Labor induction with
intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical
prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized
comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995
Oct;173(4):1137-42.
Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D and Brown D.
Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as
cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents. Obstet
Gynecol 1994 Feb;83(2):244-7.
Gregson S, Waterstone M, Norman I, Murrells T and Bull
MJ. A randomised controlled trial comparing low
dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal
gel for inducing labour at term. BJOG 2005
Apr;112(4):438-44.
Huber G, Schütz Hand Seelbach-Göbel B. Induction of
labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol
versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and
safe? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015
Jun;28(9):1043-6.
le Roux P.A., Olarogun J.O., Penny J.and Anthony J. Oral
and
vaginal
misoprostol
compared
with
dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized
controlled
trial.
Feb;99(2):201-5.
Obstet
Gynecol
Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B, Laskowska Mand Oleszczuk J.
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of
misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) in the
preinduction and induction of labor. Med Sci Monit
Sep-Oct;7(5):1023-8.
Ozkan S., Calişkan E., Doğer E.and Corakçi A. Comparative
efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus
dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at
term: a randomized trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009
Jul;280(1):19-24.
Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Otigbah CM, Howard RJ and
Nicolaides KH. Randomized study of vaginal
misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel
(PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 2001 Dec;18(6):629-35.
Surbek DV, Boesiger H, Hoesli I and Holzgreve W.A
double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy
of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to
induce labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997
Nov;177(5):1018-23.
Varaklis K, Gumina R and Stubblefield PG. Randomized
controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and
intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of
labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 1995 Oct;86(4 Pt
:541-4.
Wang X, Zhang C, Li X, Zhang W and Li T. Safety and
efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus
vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A
single-center randomized control trial. Int J
Gynaecol Obstet 2021 Sep;154(3):436-443
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 567 times
Download : 223 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
