Analysis of women’s career leadership in Taiwan: Exploring transformational leadership behavior

Weng Shih-Kun Liu(1),


(1) Department of International Business, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Traditional concepts and culture usually lead to doubts about women's leadership in the workplace. Women are often criticized for their inability to execute, lead, and perform as well as men in leadership and management. Therefore, this study aims to explore the effects of transformational leadership on leadership self-efficacy and organizational performance for women’s career leadership in Taiwan. This study employed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) to measure transformational leadership behaviors. The results of this study show that idealized influence directly affects leadership self-efficacy. Inspirational motivation and intellectual stimulation directly affect both self-efficacy and organizational performance. Furthermore, individual consideration has a direct impact on organizational performance, while leadership self-efficacy also exerts a direct influence on organizational performance. The findings reveal that career women who employ high levels of transformational variables are more likely to be more potent than those who use lower levels.

References


Bass B M. Bassand Stogdill’s handbook of leadership (3rd

ed.). New York: The Free Press 1990.

Othman S and A Hamid A H. Exploring women’s

transformational leadership style and competency: A

higher education Malaysia perspective. Asian

Journal of University Education (AJUE) 2023; 19(2):

-256.

Liu W S K. The Decision Behaviour Evaluation of

Interrelationships

among

Personality,

Transformational Leadership, Leadership Self

Efficacy, and Commitment for E-Commerce

Administrative Managers. Economics 2024; 18(1):

Spreitzer G, Perttula K and Xin K. Traditionality matters: An

examination of the effectiveness of transformational

leadership in the United States and Taiwan. Journal

of Organizational Behavior 2005; 26: 205-227.

McCauley, C D, and Palus, C J. Developing the theory and

practice of leadership development: A relational

view. The Leadership Quarterly 2021; 32(5):

Görgens-Ekermans G and Roux C. Revisiting the emotional

intelligence

and transformational leadership

debate:(How) does emotional intelligence matter to

effective leadership? SA Journal of Human Resource

Management 2021; 19: 1279.

Anderson J. C. and Gerbing DW. Structural equation

modeling in practice: a review and recommended

two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988; 103:

-23.

Downtown JV. Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma

in a revolutionary process. New York: Free press

Conger J A and Kanungo R N. Charismatic leadership in

organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1998.

Bass B M and Avolio B J. Transformational Leadership and

Organizational Culture. International Journal of

Public Administration 1994; 17(3-4): 541-554.

Bass B. M. and Avolio B. J. (Eds.). Improving

organizational

effectiveness

through

transformational leadership. Sage 1994.

Kang L, Aziz N A A and Hassan N C. Transformational

Leadership, Self-efficacy, and Work Performance

among Lecturers in Higher Education Institutions:

Conceptual Analysis on a Mediation Model.

International Journal of Academic Research in

Business & Social Sciences 2024; 14(7): 696-706.

Gist M E and Mitchell T R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical

analysis of its determinants and malleability.

Academy of Management Review 1992; 17: 183

AlKetbi A and Rice J. The impact of green human resource

management practices on employees, clients, and

organizational performance: A literature review.

Administrative Sciences 2024; 14(4): 78.

Gould-Williams J and Gatenby M. The Effects of

Organizational

Context

And Teamworking

Activities On Performance Outcomes. Public

Management Review 2010; 12(6): 759-787.

Gede D U and Huluka A T. Effects of employee

engagement on organizational performance: case of public universities in Ethiopia. Future Business

Journal 2024; 10(1): 32.

Bass B M and Avolio B J. Developing transformational

leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European

Industrial Training 1990; 14(5).

Jerusalem M and Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy as a resource

factor in stress appraisal processes. In Self-efficacy:

Thought control of action, Edited by: Schwarzer, R.

Washington, DC: Hemisphere 1992; 195–213.

Mitchell T R. A dynamic, inclusive, and affective

evolutionary view of organizational behavior.

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and

Organizational Behavior 2018; 5(1): 1-19.

Hair J F, Black W C, Babin B J, Anderson R E and Tatham

R L. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education, Inc (Taiwan): Prentice Hall 2009.

Sharma P K and Kumra R. Emotional intelligence and self

efficacy as mediators in the relationship between

transformational leadership and proactive customer

service performance. International Journal of Quality

and Service Sciences 2025; 17(1): 25-47.

Bass B. M. Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership

(3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press 1990.

Avolio B. J. and Bass B. M. Developing potential across a

full range of leadership: Cases on transactional and

transformational leadership. New Jersey: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates 2002.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 416 times
PDF Download : 204 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.