1. Home
  2. Vol 19, No 4 (2015)
  3. Bryant

Reasons for Intrauterine Device Use, Discontinuation and Non-Use in Malawi: A Qualitative Study of Women and their Partners

Amy G Bryant(1), Gloria Hamela(2), Ann Gottert(3), Gretchen S Stuart(4), Gift Kamanga(5),


(1) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
(2) UNC Project, Lilongwe, Malawi
(3) Department of Health Behavior and Health Sciences, Gillings School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC
(4) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
(5) UNC Project, Lilongwe, Malawi; Department of Health Policy and Management Gillings School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC.
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The copper intrauterine device (IUD) is a safe, long-acting, and effective method of contraception that is under-utilized in many countries, including Malawi. A unique cohort of women who had enrolled in a trial of postpartum IUD use one year earlier gave insights into reasons for using, discontinuing, or not using the IUD. We conducted in-depth interviews with 18 women one year after they participated in a pilot study of a randomized controlled trial of postpartum IUD insertion, and 10 of their male partners. Women and their partners expressed a strong desire for family planning, and perceived numerous benefits of the IUD. However, fear of the IUD was common among successful users and non-users alike. This fear arose from rumours from friends and neighbors who were non-users. How women and their partners responded to this fear affected IUD adoption and continuation. Key themes included (1) Trust in information received from health care providers versus rumours from community members; (2) Partner involvement in IUD decision-making; and (3) Experience with side effects from short-term hormonal contraceptive methods. Broad community education about the IUD‘s benefits and safety, and proactive counseling to address couples‘ specific fears, may be needed to increase uptake of the method.

References


National Statistical Office (NSO) and ICF Macro. 2011.

Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2010. Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: NSO and ICF Macro.

Family Planning Worldwide: 2008 Data Sheet. Population

Reference Bureau, 2008. (Accessed November 23, 2009,at http://www.prb.org/Datafinder/Topic/Bar.aspx? sort= v&order=d&variable=154.)

Trussell J, ed. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher, RA,

Trussell J, Nelson AL, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D, editors. Contraceptive Technology 19th revised edition. New York: Ardent Media.2007.

Bertrand JT, Carolina Population Center. The EP, Knowles

JC, Magnani RJ. Handbook of indicators for family planning program evaluation. Chapel Hill, N.C.: The EVALUATION Project, Carolina Population Center; 1994.

Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K.

Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:121-37.

United Nations Population Fund: World Contraceptive Use

at http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/ contraceptive2007/ contraceptive_ 2007_ table.pdf )

Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2000. Zomba,

Malawi, Calverton, Maryland, USA: National Statistics Office ORC Macro; 2001.

Bradley JE, Alam ME, Shabnam F, Beattie TS. Blood, men

and tears: keeping IUDs in place in Bangladesh. Culture, health & sexuality 2009;11:543-58.

Konje JC, Oladini F, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OO. Factors

determining the choice of contraceptive methods at the Family Planning Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Br J Fam Plann 1998;24:107-10.

Todd CS, Stibich MA, Laher F, et al. Influence of Culture on

Contraceptive Utilization Among HIV-Positive Women in Brazil, Kenya, and South Africa. AIDS Behav 2010.

Bryant AG, Kamanga G, Stuart GS, Haddad LB, Meguid T,

Mhango C. Immediate postpartum versus 6-week postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a feasibility

study of a randomized controlled trial. African journal of reproductive health 2013;17:72-9.

Becker S. Couples and reproductive health: a review of

couple studies. Studies in family planning 1996;27:291-306.

Sternberg P, Hubley J. Evaluating men's involvement as a

strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion. Health promotion international 2004;19:389-96.

Meekers D, Van Rossem R, Silva M, Koleros A. The reach

and effect of radio communication campaigns on condom use in Malawi. Studies in family planning 2007;38:113-20.

Shattuck D, Kerner B, Gilles K, Hartmann M, Ng'ombe T,

Guest G. Encouraging contraceptive uptake by motivating men to communicate about family planning: the Malawi Male Motivator project. American journal of public health 2011;101:1089-95.

The ACQUIRE Project. Revitalizing underutilized family

planning methods: Using communications and

Bryant et al. Reasons for IUD use in Malawi

African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2015; 19 (4):57

community engagement to stimulate demand for the IUD in Uganda. Acquiring Knowledge: The ACQUIRE Project/EngenderHealth; 2008.

Anderson FW, Mutchnick I, Kwawukume EY, et al. Who

will be there when women deliver? Assuring retention of obstetric providers. Obstetrics and gynecology 2007;110:1012-6.

Diamond-Smith N, Campbell M, Madan S. Misinformation

and fear of side-effects of family planning. Cult Health Sex 2012;14:421-33.

Melngailis I EM. Marketing and communication strategies

for ―revitalizing‖ the IUD. IUD Toolkit2006.

Morse JE, Rowen TS, Steinauer J, Byamugisha J, Kakaire O.

A qualitative assessment of Ugandan women's perceptions and knowledge of contraception.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2014;124:30-3.

Osei I, Birungi H, Addico G, Askew I, Gyapong JO. What

happened to the IUD in Ghana? African journal of reproductive health 2005;9:76-91.

Pollack A, G P, J R. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) in

developing countries: Assessing opportunities for expanding access and use. . Assessment prepared for the Hewlett Foundation Population Program; 2006.

Montgomery CM, Gafos M, Lees S, et al. Re-framing

microbicide acceptability: findings from the MDP301 trial. Cult Health Sex 2010;12:649-62.

Sundari Ravindran TK, Berer M, Cottingham J, World

Health Organization. Beyond acceptability : users' perspectives on contraception. London: Reproductive Health Matters; 1997.

Sullivan TM, Bertrand JT, Rice J, Shelton JD. Skewed

contraceptive method mix: why it happens, why it matters. Journal of biosocial science 2006;38:501-21.

Nalwadda G, Mirembe F, Byamugisha J, Faxelid E.

Persistent high fertility in Uganda: young people recount obstacles and enabling factors to use of contraceptives. BMC public health 2010;10:530.

Paz Soldan VA. How family planning ideas are spread

within social groups in rural Malawi. Studies in family planning 2004;35:275-90


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 864 times
PDF Download : 11 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.