What it does and does not do: Effects of ultrasound viewing on women’s intention to terminate a pregnancy
),
(1) Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, PO Box 392, Pretoria, South Africa
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging is a renowned prenatal technology used globally to assess foetal growth, viability and abnormalities. In South Africa, ultrasound viewing has not been made mandatory for women who want to terminate their pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to provide a deeper understanding of the effects of ultrasound viewing on women’s intention to terminate their pregnancies. Fifteen women in their first trimester were recruited for the study from a community health centre mandated for abortion. Van Manen’s hermeneutic phenomenological analysis method was adopted for the study. Three major themes emerged from the data analysis: motivation beyond ultrasound viewing, the emotional burden of the experience, and viewing the ultrasound image as punishment. The study concluded that even though most participants reported the ultrasound viewing negatively affected their person, their reason for termination was so strong that they would not change their minds. However, the ultrasound viewing helped three participants to earnestly reflect on their situations, weigh the pros and cons, and subsequently decide to continue their pregnancy. (Afr J Reprod Health 2023; 27 [3]: 71-76).
References
Beynon-Jones SM. Re-visioning ultrasound through women’s accounts of pre-abortion care in England. Gender & Society 2015; 29(5): 694-715. [Google Scholar]
Roberts J. ‘Wakey, wakey, baby’: narrating four-dimensional (4D) bonding scans. The Sociology of Medical Screening: Critical Perspectives, New Directions 2021; 34(2): 161-314. [Google Scholar]
Neff CL. Women, womb, and bodily integrity. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1991; 3(327). [Google Scholar]
National Department of Health. National Clinical Guidelines for Implementation of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act. Pretoria: National Department of Health Republic of South Africa; 2019. [Google Scholar]
Kjelsvik M, Sekse RJ, Aasen EM and Gjengedal E. Viewing the image? Ultrasound examination during abortion preparations, ethical challenges. Nursing ethics. 2022; 29(2): 511-522. [Google Scholar]
Upadhyay UD, Kimport K, Belusa EK, Johns NE, Laube DW and Roberts SC. Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: a mixed methods study. PloS one. 2017; 12(7): e0178871. [Google Scholar]
National Abortion Federation. Clinical Policy Guidelines. 2020. [Google Scholar]
Venkatraman R. “Women’s Right to Know” Informed Consent Informational Materials. Downloaded from https://hpsrepository. asu.edu/handle/10776/13275 on 10 May, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Gius M. Using the Synthetic Control Method to Determine the Effect of Ultrasound Laws on State-Level Abortion Rates. Atlantic Economic Journal. 2019; 47: 205–215. [Google Scholar]
Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario: Althouse Press. 1990. [Google Scholar]
Van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. New York: Routledge; 2014. [Google Scholar]
Polit DF and Beck CT. Nursing Research, Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. New York: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012.
Gray JR, Grove S K and Sutherland S. The Practice of Nursing Research Appraisal, Synthesis and Generation of Evidence. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2017.
Gatter M, Kimport K, Foster D G, Weitz TA and Upadhyay UD. Relationship Between Ultrasound Viewing and Proceeding to Abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014; 123 (1): 81-87. [Google Scholar]
Kirkman M, Rowe H, Hardiman A and Rosenthal D. Abortion is a difficult solution to a problem: A discursive analysis of interviews with women considering or undergoing abortion in Australia. In Women's Studies International Forum. 2011; 34(2): 121-129. [Google Scholar]
Silverman JG, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Gupta J, Miller E, Raj A and Goldberg AB. Male perpetration of intimate partner violence and involvement in abortions and abortion-related conflict. American Journal of Public Health. 2010; 100(8): 1415-1417. [Google Scholar].
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 595 times
Download : 350 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
