Uptake and determinants of post-partum intra-uterine contraceptive device use among women in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: A prospective cohort study

Upkar Budhram Gungapursad(1), Mala Panday(2),


(1) Senior Managing Editor, African Journal of Reproductive Health (AJRH)
(2) Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Science, University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to determine the uptake of the post-partum intra-uterine contraceptive device (PPIUD) and characteristics of women choosing PPIUD. The authors evaluated safety, efficacy and satisfaction following PPIUD insertion via a prospective cohort study.  276 pregnant women (age: 16-50 years) gave informed consent and received a PPIUD. Follow up was between 6-8 weeks postpartum. The mean age was 25.8 years with 74.9% being gravida 2-4. The follow up rate was 60.5%. PPIUD was found to be safe and acceptable with 79.6% of participants experiencing no side effects and 74.3% expressing high satisfaction. No pregnancies were reported. Expulsions (n=15) were not associated with gravidity, parity, gestational age or medical and surgical risk factors. (p-value >0.05). PPIUD is a safe, effective and acceptable form of contraception. Participants experienced few side effects and high satisfaction. Low follow-up is a concern. (Afr J Reprod Health 2022; 26[2]: 126-136).

References


Sedgh G, Singh S and Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301-314. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x

National Department of Health (NDoH), Statistictics South Africa (Stats SA), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) I. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key findings. NDoH, Stats SA, SAMRC, ICF. 2018;(January):1-20. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/688761571934946384/pdf/Doing-Business-2020-Comparing-Business-Regulation-in-190-Economies.pdf

Haffejee F, Govender N, Reddy P, Sibiya MN, Ghuman S, Ngxongo T, Borg D and O’Connor L. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy among women attending a public health facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. South African Fam Pract. 2018;60(3):79-83. doi:10.1080/20786190.2017.1396790

Jackson E and Glasier A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):657-662. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ce18c

Brito MB, Ferriani RA, Quintana SM, Yazlle MEHD, Silva de Sá MF and Vieira CS. Safety of the etonogestrel-releasing implant during the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study. Contraception. 2009;80(6):519-526. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.124

Katheit G and Agarwal J. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance, and expulsion in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2:539. doi:10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20131210

Gutin S, Mlobeli R, Moss M, Buga G and Morroni C. Survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding the intrauterine device in South Africa. Contraception. 2011;83:145-150. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.009

Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A and Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet (London, England). 2006;368(9549):1810-1827. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4

DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A and Rahman M. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG. 2007;114(9):1079-1087. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01338.x

World Health Organisation. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. Rep a WHO Tech Consult Birth Spacing. 2005;13(6):1-44. http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/birth_spacing.pdf

Huber‐Krum S, Hackett K, Senderowicz L, Pearson E, Francis JM, Siril H, Ulenga N and Shah I. Women’s Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania. Stud Fam Plann. 2019;50(4):317-336. doi:10.1111/sifp.12106

Department of Health. National Contraception Clinical Guidelines. Guideline. Published online 2012:1-110.

Trussell J, Hassan F, Lowin J, Law A and Filonenko A. Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2015;91(1):49-56. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.011

United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Contraceptive Use by Method 2019 - Data Booklet. Contracept Use by Method 2019. Published online 2019:25. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf

Van Zijl S, Morroni C and Van Der Spuy ZM. A survey to assess knowledge and acceptability of the intrauterine device in the Family Planning Services in Cape Town, South Africa. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care. 2010;36(2):73-78. doi:10.1783/147118910791069367

van der Westhuizen N and Hanekom G. Patient knowledge about and intention to use the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) at a tertiary-level hospital. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;22(2):42-46. doi:10.7196/SAJOG.2016.v22i2.1048

Massyn N, Barron P, Day C, Ndlovu N and Padarath AE. District Health Barometer 2018/19. Durban: Health Systems Trust. Vol 53.; 2020.

Datey S, Gaur LN and Saxena BN. Vaginal bleeding patterns of women using different contraceptive methods (implants, injectables, IUDs, oral pills)—An Indian experience: An ICMR task force study. Contraception. 1995;51(3):155-165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(95)00012-Y

Cwiak C. Seminars in Perinatology Contraception for high risk patients. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44(5):151268. doi:10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151268

Kapp N and Curtis K. Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: A systematic review. Contraception. 2009;80:327-336. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.024

Jatlaoui TC, Whiteman MK, Jeng G, Tepper NK, Berry-Bibee E, Jamieson DJ, Marchbanks PA and Curtis KM. Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):895-905. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002822

Mishra S. Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Expulsion of Post-Placental and Intra-Cesarean Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(5):337-343. doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0550-3

Kittur S and Kabadi Y. Enhancing contraceptive usage by post-placental intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) insertion with evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2012;1:26-32. doi:10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog001112

Levi EE, Stuart GS, Zerden ML, Garrett JM and Bryant AG. Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):5-11. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000882

Rezai S. Postpartum intrauterine device contraception: A review. World J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(1):134. doi:10.5317/wjog.v5.i1.134

Pfitzer A, Mackenzie D, Blanchard H, Hyjazi Y, Kumar S, Lisanework Kassa S, Marinduque B, Mateo MG, Mukarugwiro B, Ngabo F and Zaeem S. A facility birth can be the time to start family planning: Postpartum intrauterine device experiences from six countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;130(S2):S54-S61. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.008

de Caestecker L, Banks L, Bell E, Sethi M and Arulkumaran S. Planning and implementation of a FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative in six countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:4-12. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12598

Makins A, Taghinejadi N, Sethi M, Machiyama K, Thapa K, Perera G, Munganyizi PS, Bhardwaj A and Arulkumaran S. Factors influencing the likelihood of acceptance of postpartum intrauterine devices across four countries: India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(S1):13-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12599

Achyut P, Mishra A, Montana L, Sengupta R, Calhoun LM and Nanda P. Integration of family planning with maternal health services: An opportunity to increase

postpartum modern contraceptive use in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care. 2016;42(2):107-115. doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101271

Eluwa GIE, Atamewalen R, Odogwu K and Ahonsi B. Success providing postpartum intrauterine devices in private-sector health care facilities in Nigeria: Factors associated with uptake. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):276-283. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00072

KwaZulu Natal Department of Health. eThwkini District Health Plan 2015/16. Published online 2016:1-120. http://www.kznhealth.gov.za/Strategic/DHP/2015-16/eThekwini.pdf

The ACQUIRE Project. The Postpartum Intrauterine Device: A Training Course for Service Providers. Trainer’s Manual.; 2008.

Midwives. No Title. In: R K Khan Hospital Grandfather Book.

Kaneshiro B and Aeby T. Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:211-220. doi:10.2147/ijwh.s6914

Makins A, Taghinejadi N, Sethi M, Machiyama K, Munganyizi P, Odongo E, Divakar H, Fatima P, Thapa K, Perera G and Arulkumaran S. FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: Complication rates across six countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143

Suppl:20-27. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12600

Speroff L DP. A Clinical Guide for Contraception 5th Edition.

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

Adanikin AI, Awoleke JO, Adeyiolu A, Alao O and Adanikin PO. Resumption of intercourse after childbirth in southwest Nigeria. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal care Off J Eur Soc Contracept. 2015;20(4):241-248. doi:10.3109/13625187.2014.971742

Thiery M, Van Kets H and Van Der Pas H. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion: The expulsion problem. Contraception. 1985;31(4):331-349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(85)90002-2

Albers LL. Health problems after childbirth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000;45(1):55-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(99)00003-3

Blumenthal PD, Lerma K, Bhamrah R and Singh S. Comparative safety and efficacy of a dedicated postpartum IUD inserter versus forceps for immediate postpartum IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2018;98(3):215-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.019

Kroon CD De, Houwelingen JC Van, Trimbos JB and Jansen FW. The value of transvaginal ultrasound to monitor the position of an intrauterine device after insertion . A technology assessment study. 2003;18(11):2323-2327. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg433

Anteby E, Revel A, Ben-Chetrit A, Rosen B, Tadmor O and Yagel S. Intrauterine device failure: relation to its location within the uterine cavity. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(1):112-114..


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 771 times
PDF Download : 304 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.