Age differences and protected first heterosexual intercourse in Ghana

Joshua Amo-Adjei(1),


(1) Nairawebs Design
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Age differences between partners, where females are relatively younger than their male partners, can negatively affect power dynamics and subsequent negotiations for safe sex practices with implications on unplanned pregnancies and STIs transmission. This paper examines the effects of age differentials on condom use at first sex. Using a weighted sample of 925 women drawn from the fifth round of Ghana Demographic and Health Survey and applying complementary log-log model, the probability of first sex being protected vis-à-vis partner age differences are estimated. The results suggest that females’ being ten or more years younger than their male partners at first sex was a significant indicator of non-protection while at age intervals 1-4 and 5-9 years, the probability of protected sex inflates significantly. The results demonstrate that large age disparities between partners pose a significant barrier to protection during first sex and strategies have to be developed to altering wrong perceptions associated with intergenerational sex, particularly, in settings such as Africa where gerontocratic tendencies pervade not only social relationships but sexual as well.  (Afr J Reprod Health 2012; 16[4]: 58-67).

Résumé

Les différences d'âge entre les partenaires, chez qui les femmes sont relativement plus jeunes que leurs partenaires masculins, peuvent affecter de manière négative la dynamique du pouvoir et des négociations ultérieures sur les pratiques sexuelles sans risque avec les implications sur les grossesses non planifiées et de la transmission des IST. Cette étude examine les effets des écarts d'âge sur l'utilisation du préservatif au premier rapport sexuel.  A l’aide d'un échantillon pondéré de 925 femmes tirées de la cinquième phase de l'Enquête Démographique et de Santé du Ghana et de l'application du modèle log-log complémentaire, la possibilité de protéger le premier rapport sexuel  vis-à-vis des différences d'âge entre des partenaires a été estimée. Les résultats suggèrent que le fait que les femmes sont au moins dix ans plus jeunes que leurs partenaires masculins lors du premier rapport sexuel, était un indice significatif de non-protection tout en intervalles d'âge de 1-4 et de 5-9 ans ;  la possibilité de rapports sexuels protégés est gonflée de façon significative. Les résultats montrent que les disparités d'âge entre les partenaires constituent un obstacle important à la protection lors de leur premier rapport sexuel et les stratégies doivent être élaborées pour modifier les perceptions erronées qui sont liées au sexe intergénérationnel, en particulier, dans des milieux comme l'Afrique où les tendances gérontocratiques envahissent non seulement des rapports sociaux, mais sexuels aussi (Afr J Reprod Health 2012; 16[4]: 58-67).

Keywords: age mixing, intergenerational, first sex, protection, Ghana


References


Jewkes R Levin J Mbananga N and Bradshaw D. Rape of girls in South Africa. Lancet 2002; 359: 319-320.

Glynn JR Caraël M Auvert B Kahindo M Chege J Musonda R Kaona F Buvé A & Study Group on the Heterogeneity of HIV Epidemics in African Cities. Why do young women have a much higher prevalence of HIV than young men? A study in Kisumu, Kenya, and Ndola, Zambia. AIDS 2001; 15(Suppl. 4): S51– S60.

Gregson S Nyamukapa CA Garnett GP Mason PR Zhuwau T Caraël M Chandiwana SK and Anderson RM. Sexual mixing patterns and sex differentials in teenage exposure to HIV infection in rural Zimbabwe, Lancet 2002; 359 (9321): 1896–1903.

Kelly RJ Gray RH Sewankambo NK Serwadda D Wabwire-Mangen F Lutalo T and Wawer MJ. Age differences in sexual partners and risk of HIV-1 infection in rural Uganda. J AIDS 2003; 32(4): 446– 451.

Nyanzi S Pool R and Kinsman J. The negotiation of sexual relationships among school pupils in southwestern Uganda. AIDS Care 2000; 13(1): 83–98.

Rasch V Silberschmidt M Mchumvu Y and Mmary V.

Adolescent girls with illegally induced abortion in Dar es Salaam: the discrepancy between sexual behaviour and lack of access to contraception. Reprod Health Matt, 8(15): 52–62.

Silberschmidt M and Rasch V. Adolescent girls, illegal abortions and “sugar daddies” in Dar es Salaam: Vulnerable victim and active social agents. Soc Sci and Med 2001; 53(12): 1815-1826.

Luke N and Kurz KM. Cross-generational and transactional sexual relations in sub-Saharan Africa: Prevalence of behaviour and implications for negotiating safer sexual practices. New York: AIDS, 2002.

Fuglesang M. Lessons for life-past and present modes of sexuality education in Tanzanian society. Soc Sci and Med 1997; 44(8): 1245-1254.

Moore AM Awusabo-Asare K Madise N John-Langbe J Kumi-Kyereme K. Coerced first sex among adolescent girls in sub-Sharan Africa: Prevalence and context. Afri. J. Reprod. Health 2007; 11(3): 62-82.

Darroch JE Landry DJ and Oslak S. Age differences between sexual partners in the United States. Fam Plann Persp 1999; 31(4): 160-167.

Pylypchuk R and Marston C. Factors associated with sexual risk behavior among young people in Ukraine. Cent Euro J Pub Heal 2008; 16(4): 165-174.

Mercer CH Wellings K Macdowall W Copas AJ McManus S Erens B Fenton KA and Johnson AM. First sexual partnerships—age differences and their significance: Empirical evidence from the 2000 British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (‘Natsal 2000’). J Adolesc Health 2006; 39: 87–95.

Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

Gorgen R Mohamed L Yansane MM and Millimounou D. Sexual behavior and attitudes among unmarried urban youths in Guinea. Intl Fam Plann Persp 1998; 24(2): 65-71.

Gage AJ and Bledsoe C. “The effects of education and social stratification on marriage and the transition to parenthood in Freetown, Sierra Leone.” In Bledsoe C and Pison G (Eds.). Nuptiality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Contemporary Anthropological and Demographic Perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, 148 – 164.

Adepoju A and Mbugua W. The African Family: An overview of changing forms, In: Adepoju, A (Ed.). Family, Population and Development in Africa, London: Zed, 1997, 41–59.

Kaufman CE and Stavrou SE. “Bus fare please”: The economics of sex, gifts and violence among adolescents in urban South Africa. Cul, Health & Sexual, 6(5): 377-391.

Guilla G and Madise N. HIV/AIDS and sexual risk behaviours among adolescents: Factors influencing the use of condoms in Burkina Faso. Afr J Reprod Health 2007; 11(3): 182-196.

Komba-Malekela B and Liljestrom R (1994). Looking for men. In Tumbo-Masabo Z and Liljestrom R (Eds.) Chelewa, chelewa: The dilemma of teenage girls. The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.

Madise N Zulu EM and Cierra J. Is poverty a driver for risky sexual behaviour? Evidence from national surveys of adolescents in four African countries. Afri J Reprod Heal 2007; 11(3): 83-98.

Moore, A. M., Biddlecom, A. E., & Zula, E. M.. Prevalence and meanings of exchange of money or gifts for sex in unmarried adolescent sexual relationships in sub-Saharan Africa. Afri J Reprod Heath 2007; 11(3): 44-61.

Landry, D. J. & Forrest, J. D. How old are U.S. fathers? Fam Plann Pers 1995; 27(4): 159–161 & 165.

Luke, N. Confronting the ‘sugar daddy’ stereotype: Age and economic asymmetries and risky sexual behaviour in urban Kenya. Inter Fam Plann Pers 2005; 31(1): 6– 14.

Edström, J. & Khan, N. Perspectives on Intergenerational Vulnerability for Adolescents Affected by HIV: An Argument for Voice and Visibility. IDS Bull. 2009 40(1): 41-50.

Gabrysch S, Edwards T, Glynn J. R., Study Group on Heterogeneity of HIV Epidemics in African Cities. The role of context: neighbourhood characteristics

Awusabo-Asare, K & Annim, S.K. Wealth status and strongly influence HIV risk in young women in risky sexual behaviour in Ghana and Kenya. Appl Ndola, Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:162– Health Econ Health Poli, 2008, 6:1: 27-39. 70.

Luke, N. Economic Status, Informal Exchange, and Sexual Risk in Kisumu, Kenya. Econ. Develop. & Cul. Cha, 2008, 56(2): 375-396.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 488 times
PDF Download : 183 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.