Family Planning Providers’ Experiences and Perceptions of LongActing Reversible Contraception in Lilongwe, Malawi

Tapika Mwafulirwa, Michele S. O’Shea, Gloria Hamela, Emilia Samuel, Christine Chingondole, Virginia Chipangula, Mina C. Hosseinipour, Jennifer H. Tang


Less than 2% of Malawian women use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). We describe experiences of Malawian family planning providers, focusing on LARC. We conducted a mixed-methods study using questionnaires and focus group discussions with providers in Lilongwe. Data were analyzed separately and triangulated. Most (58%) participants saw over 30 patients daily. Only 19% had ever inserted IUC. Qualitative data were complementary; participants noted that LARC provision was important, though hindered by lack of experienced providers, work burden, and low demand. Future efforts to improve LARC access in Lilongwe must address both supply and demand-side barriers. (Afr J Reprod Health 2016; 20[2]: 62-71).

Full Text:



WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank, and the

Mwafulirwa et al. Family planning provision in Malawi

African Journal of Reproductive Health June 2016; 20 (2): 71

United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2010. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2012. 2. National Statistical Office. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey. Zomba, Malawi and Calverton, Maryland, USA: National Statistical Office;2011. 3. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011; 1(83): 397-404. 4. Sullivan TM, Bertrand JT, Rice J, Shelton JD. Skewed contraceptive method mix: why it happens, why it matters. Journal Biosoc Sci 2006; 38(4): 501-521. 5. Shelton J. The provider perspective: human after all. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001; 27(3): 152-153, 161. 6. Stanback JaT-B, K.A. Why do family planning providers restrict access to services? An examination in Ghana. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2001; 27(1): 37-41. 7. Hajii N LA. Etude qualitative sur le dispositif intrauterin au Maroc. Rabat, Morocco: Royaume du Maroc, Ministère de la Santé Publique, Direction de la Population, Programme de Planification Familiale; 1996. 8. Johson L, Katz, K., Janowitz, B. Determining reasons for low IUD use in El Salvador. Research Triangle Park: Family Health International; 2000. 9. Stanback J, Omondi-Odhiambo, Omudo D. Final report. Why has IUD use slowed in Kenya? Part A. Qualitative assessment of IUD service delivery in Kenya. Research Triangle Park: Family Health International; 1995. 10. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long- acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(21): 1998-2007. 11. Ulin PR, Robinson, E. T., Tolley, E. E. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. San Francisco, CA: Family Health International; 2005. 12. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010; 341: c4587. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2006 - working together for health. Geneva, Switzerland;2006. 13. Mugisha JF, Reynolds H. Provider perspectives on barriers to family planning quality in Uganda: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008; 34(1): 37-41. 14. Khan M.E. GRB. Quality of family planning services from provider's perspective: Observations from a

qualitative study in Sitapur District, Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Population Council; 1995. 15. Michie L, Cameron ST. Improving the uptake of long acting reversible contraception: a review. Minerva Ginecol 2013; 65(3): 241-252. 16. Hindin MJ, McGough LJ, Adanu RM. Misperceptions, misinformation and myths about modern contraceptive use in Ghana. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2014; 40(1): 30-35. 17. Chipeta EK, Chimwaza W, Kalilani-Phiri L. Contraceptive knowledge, beliefs and attitudes in rural Malawi: misinformation, misbeliefs and misperceptions. Malawi Med J 2010; 22(2): 38-41. 18. Hubacher D, Olawo A, Manduku C, Kiarie J. Factors associated with uptake of subdermal contraceptive implants in a young Kenyan population. Contraception 2011; 84(4): 413-417. 19. Mutemwa R, Mayhew S, Colombini M, Busza J, Kivunaga J, Ndwiga C. Experiences of health care providers with integrated HIV and reproductive health services in Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 18. 20. van Zijl S, Morroni C, van der Spuy ZM. A survey to assess knowledge and acceptability of the intrauterine device in the Family Planning Services in Cape Town, South Africa. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010; 36(2): 73-78. 21. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, fourth edition. Geneva, Switzerland; 2009b. 22. Weisberg E, Fraser IS, Goss S. The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in New South Wales. Med J Aust 1994; 160(1): 19-21. 23. Chimhutu V, Lindkvist I, Lange S. When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 23. 24. Hong R, Montana L, Mishra V. Family planning services quality as a determinant of use of IUD in Egypt. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6: 79. 25. Khu NH, Vwalika B, Karita E, et al. Fertility goal-based counseling increases contraceptive implant and IUD use in HIV-discordant couples in Rwanda and Zambia. Contraception 2013; 88(1): 74-82.


  • There are currently no refbacks.