Use of Modern Birth Control Methods Among Rural Communities in Imo State, Nigeria

Ike Nwachukwu, O.O. Obasi

Abstract

This paper studied the extent of utilization of Modern Birth Control Methods (MBCM) among rural dwellers in Imo State Nigeria.  Three hundred and sixty households were randomly selected and data were obtained from them with the use of questionnaires and Focus Group Discussion.  The results showed that only  30% of the respondents used MBCM while 57% of them used the traditional birth control methods.  The most popular modern method was the condom (24.2%).  This was followed by the IUD, used by only 2.5% of the respondents. Some of the identified factors that hindered the use of MBCM included perceived negative health reaction, fear of the unknown effects, cost, spouse’s disapproval, religious belief and inadequate information.  For a better understanding and utilization of MBCM, it is recommended that adequate educational campaign should be mounted in the rural areas on the advantages of MBCM. This campaign should target the men the more because they make the major decisions on MBCM use. (Afr Reprod Health 2008; 12[1]:101-108).

RÉSUMÉ

L’utilisation des méthodes modernes de contrôle des naissances au sein des communautés rurales dans l’état d’Imo, Nigéria L’article a étudié l’ampleur de l’utilisation des méthodes modernes de contrôle des naissances (MMCN) au sein des villageois dans l’Etat d’Imo, Nigeria.  Trois-cent-soixante familles ont été sélectionnées au hasard et des données ont été obtenues à l’aide des questionnaires et des Discussions en Groupes Cible.  Les résultats ont montré que seuls 30% des gens interroges utilisaient les MMCN alors que 57% d’eux utilisaient les méthodes traditionnelles de contrôle des naissances.  La méthode moderne la plus populaire était le préservatif (24,2%).  Le DIU venait après, utilisé par seuls 2,5% des personnes interrogées.  Quelques facteurs identifies qui ont entravé l’utilisation des MMCN ont compris une réaction médicale négative perçue, la crainte des effets inconnus, le coût, la désapprobation de l’époux, la croyance religieuse et l’information insuffisante.  Pour une meilleure compréhension et utilisation des MMCN, nous proposons qu’une campagne éducative adéquate soit montée dans les régions rurales sur les avantages des MMCN.  Cette campagne devrait avoir comme cibles les hommes plus que les femmes parce qu’ils prennent les décisions principales sur l’utilisation des MMCN. (Rev Afr Santé Reprod 2008; 12[1]:101-108).

 

KEY WORDS:  Birth control. Rural communities. Utilization. Methods

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ehrlich A.H. and Ehrlicn P. R. Optimum Human Population Size. Journal of Population a n d Environment 15(6) 1994

Malthus T.R. An Essay on Population. 2 Vols. E P Dutton and Co. Inc. New York.

Huxley, I. Introduction. In Cook R.C. Human fertility. William Sloane Associates. New York. 1951

Moor,J. A search for order in complexity. Zondervan Pub. House pp 518 –519.1976

Braddocks, J. Reading in Social Problem. Dushkin Pub. Group Inc. pp193 – 199. 1977

Jones, M. The Capacity of Africa’s Agricultural Sector to contribute to achieving the UN M i l l e n n i u m Development Goals. Annual Report Special Paper. CTA Netherlands.2004

WOA (World Overpopulation Awareness. www.overpopulation org. visited 27/1/07.

Illingworth, B. Birth control in developing nations.

Planned Parenthood. www.planned-

parenthood.org Visited 20/3/07

Lacey, L. et al. Decentralization of Population Programmes in Sub-Sahara Africa: Concepts and Issues. Options. Regional Workshop on Strategic Planning Programmes inSub-Sahara Africa. Kampala, Uganda.1993

Furtado, J.I.R et. al. Economic Development and Environmental Sustainable Policies and Principles for

a Durable Equilibrium. World Bank, Washington. 2000

Okoroafor O. E. Large Families: Causes, Consequences and Cures. Springfield Pub. Owerri. 2001

NPC (Nigerian Population commission) Resultof 2007 census figures.

Khurfeld, M. Thousands feared born in Nigeria’s population explosion. The Onion. www.theonion.com 2006

Moni, N. Family Planning Success Stories in Bangladesh and India. Policy Research Working Paper No. 1041, World Bank. 1992

World Bank. Population and development. Annual report 2004 .

Duze, M.C and I.Z Mohammed. Male knowledge,attitude and family planning practices in Northern Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health. Vol 10, No 3 2006.

F O S (Federal Office of Statistics) General household Survey. National Report.Abuja. 2000

Ekong E. E. An introduction to Rural Sociology. 2nd Edition. Dove Publications, Uyo, Nigeria pp. 143 – 151. 2003.

F O S . The Statistical Profile of Nigerian Women.Abuja. 1997

Poverty and Agricultural Sector in Nigeria. Abuja.1998

Haub, C. and Yangishila M. “Environment and Population”. World Population Data Sheet. Washington D.C. Population Bureau. 1992

UNFPA (United Nations Funds for Population) Myths, misrepresentation and fear. Addressing condom use barriers. Occasional Publication. 2007

Makinwa-Adebusuyi P.K. “Socio-cultural Factors affecting fertility in sub-Saharan Africa’. Prospects for fertility decline in high fertility countries. Population Division, United Nations N.Y.2001

Population Reference Bureau . “Demographic Profile: Women of the World. Washington, D.C. 2002

Johnson-Hanks Time and Social Context ofFertility. Population and Development Review 28(2) 229-249. 2002.

UNFPA. State of the World Population. AnnualReport 2006

Baron, D L “Quantitative Research For Family Planning Programs In Africa”. Occasional paper, No.2. Centre for communication programs, John Hopkins School of Public Health. Maryland. 1993

Imo, A.N. Family size and the participation of women in the socio-economic development of Mbaise, Imo

State, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation – Michael Okpara University of Agriculture,

Umudike, Nigeria. 2002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.