Clinical application of airbag bionic midwifery technology in vaginal delivery of pregnancy with scarred uterus

Muling Zhang, Zhou XY

Abstract

This was an original article, mainly explored the effect of applying airbag bionic midwifery technology in vaginal delivery of scarred uterus pregnancy. Sixty patients were chosen, and divided into an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). The results showed that in contrast to the CG, the IG had shorter first, second and total stages of labor (P<0.01), less amounts of blood loss during delivery and 2 h after delivery (P<0.01), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) score (P<0.01), higher natural delivery rate, lower forceps assisted delivery rate and cesarean section rate (P<0.05), lower incidence of postpartum complications (P<0.05), and higher childbirth satisfaction (P<0.05). We conclude that the implementation of airbag bionic midwifery technology in vaginal delivery of scarred uterus pregnancy has obvious effects, which can effectively promote the success of vaginal delivery, shorten the stages of labor, and alleviate the degree of pain. We recommend its more routine application in obstetric clinical practice.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Zhang Y, Zhang T, Liu X, Zhang L, Hong F and Lu M.

Research trends of pregnancy with scarred uterus

after cesarean: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;

(18):3555-3564.

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer

CS, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H,

Taylor P and Temmerman M. Short-term and longterm effects of caesarean section on the health of

women and children. Lancet. 2018;

(10155):1349-1357.

Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C and Gyte

GM. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at

term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;

(3):Cd004660.

Wei D, Qian X, Hong Y, Ye R and He D. Effect of midwife

intervention coupled with acupressure on the vaginal

delivery rate and negative emotion in parturients with

scarred uterus re-pregnancy. Am J Transl Res. 2021;

(8):9429-9436.

Aboshama RA, Taha OT, Abdel Halim HW, Elrehim EIA,

Kamal SHM, ElSherbiny AM, Magdy HA, Albayadi

E, Elsaid RE, Abdelghany AM, Anan MA and

Abdelfattah LE. Prevalence and risk factor of

postoperative adhesions following repeated cesarean

section: A prospective cohort study. Int J Gynaecol

Obstet. 2023; 161(1):234-240.

Klahr R, Cheung K, Markovic ES, Naert M, Rebarber A and

Fox NS. Maternal Morbidity with Repeated Cesarean

Deliveries. Am J Perinatol. 2023; 40(13):1431-1436.

Larsson C, Matsson A, Mooe T, Söderström L, Tunón K and

Nordin P. Cardiovascular complications following

cesarean section and vaginal delivery: a national

population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal

Med. 2022; 35(25):8072-8079.

Zhao S, Wen J, Niu J, Xia J, Zhou L and Zou W. The clinical

research into the application of multifunctional airbag

abdominal pressure belt in midwifery and in the

prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. J Matern Fetal

Neonatal Med. 2018; 31(1):128-134.

Cheuk QK, Lo TK, Lee CP and Yeung AP. Double balloon

catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women

with previous caesarean section: one-year experience

and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;

(3):243-50.

Ma J, Shao H, Lu X, Zhang B and Zhang G. Safety and

efficacy of airbag midwifery in promoting normal

vaginal delivery and reducing caesarean section.

Iranian journal of reproductive medicine. 2012;

(6):595-600.

Sung YT and Wu JS. The Visual Analogue Scale for

Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VASRRP): A new technique for psychological

measurement. Behav Res Methods. 2018;

(4):1694-1715.

Cnattingius S, Johansson S and Razaz N. Apgar Score and

Risk of Neonatal Death among Preterm Infants. N

Engl J Med. 2020; 383(1):49-57.

Karanth L and Abas AB. Maternal and foetal outcomes

following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (csection) delivery in women with bleeding disorders

and carriers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;

(12):Cd011059.

Hou Y, Zhou X, Yao M and Liu S. Fear of childbirth and

its predictors in re-pregnant women after cesarean

section: a cross-sectional multicenter study in China.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):393.

Armbrust R, Hinkson L, von Weizsäcker K and Henrich W.

The Charité cesarean birth: a family orientated

approach of cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal

Med. 2016; 29(1):163-8.

Sanés A. [Understanding natural childbirth]. Rev Enferm.

; 23(6):418-21.

Gonzalez N and Tulandi T. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A

Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;

(5):731-738.

Sánchez-López E, Gómara MJ and Haro I.

Nanotechnology-Based Platforms for Vaginal

Delivery of Peptide Microbicides. Curr Med Chem.

; 28(22):4356-4379.

Reddy SC and Alias R. Tono-pen measurement of

intraocular pressure under topical anaesthesia in full

term normal newborns. International journal of

ophthalmology. 2014; 7(1):92-4.

Cohain JS. Episiotomy is obsolete: cinnamon gel applied

after episiotomy endangers lives. J Integr Med. 2015;

(4):215-6.

Borgia G, Carleo MA, Gaeta GB and Gentile I. Hepatitis B

in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;

(34):4677-83.

Zhang GJCJoCO, Gynecology. The research on the

efficacy and safety of bionic air-bag midwifery. 2010;

Owattanapanich N, Lewis MR, Benjamin ER, Wong MD

and Demetriades D. Motor vehicle crashes in

pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes. J Trauma

Acute Care Surg. 2021; 90(5):861-865

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.