Do gender-equitable attitudes translate to gender-equitable choresharing behavior? A sex-stratified longitudinal analysis among adolescents in Kinshasa

Kathryn M. Barker(1), Caroline Moreau(2), Mengmeng Li(3), Jennifer Gayles(4), Kristin Mmari(5), Eric Mafuta(6), Kara Hunersen(7), Rebecka Lundgren(8),


(1) Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego
(2) 
(3) Dept Population Family and Reproductive Health, Bloomberg school of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University
(4) Save the Children Federation
(5) Dept Population Family and Reproductive Health, Bloomberg school of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University2
(6) Kinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa
(7) Dept Population Family and Reproductive Health, Bloomberg school of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University
(8) Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Unpaid care work is disproportionately performed by women and girls, negatively impacting their ability to engage in educational, social, and economic opportunities. Despite calls to address these inequities, empirical evidence on interventions designed to shift gender attitudes is limited, especially within adolescent populations. To address this gap, we used longitudinal data to conduct difference-in-difference and logistic regression models to examine the impact of a norms-shifting intervention in Kinshasa on adolescent gender-equitable chore-sharing attitudes. As compared to controls, intervention participants were 2.3 times (p<0.001) more likely to hold gender-equitable attitudes towards chore-sharing at end line. Using baseline attitudes to predict end line behavior, we find that, as compared to adolescents with gender-inequitable attitudes, boys and girls who espoused equitable gender attitudes were 1.9 times (p<0.001) and 1.5 times (p=0.005), respectively, more likely to report gender-equitable chore-sharing behavior. Norms-shifting interventions should be prioritized among very young adolescents as a strategy to shift gender-inequitable attitudes. (Afr J Reprod Health 2022; 26[12s]: 88-97).

References


Barker G, Garg A, Heilman B, van der Gaag N and

Mehaffey R. State of the World's Fathers: Structural

Solutions to Achieve Equality in Care Work.

Washington, DC: Promundo-US, 2021.

Budlender D. Time Use Studies and Unpaid Care Work.

New York, NY: Routledge 2010.

Folbre N. Valuing Non-market Work. New York, NY:

United Nations Development Programme, 2015.

Folbre N. The Care Penalty and Gender Inequality. In:

Averett SL, Argys LM, Hoffman SD, eds. Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy. New York,

NY: Oxford University Press 2018.

Office IL. Care work and care jobs for the future of decent

work. Geneva: International Labor Office, 2018.

UNICEF. Harnessing the Power of Data for Girls: Taking

Stock and Looking Ahead to 2030. New York, NY:

United Nations Children's Fund, 2016.

UNICEF. Uneven Expectatations: Measuring Gender

Norms to Address Children's Engagement in Unpaid

Work. New York, NY: United Nations Children's

Fund (UNICEF), 2021.

Lyon S, Ranzani M and Rosati FC. Unpaid household

services and child labour, working paper. Rome:

International Labour Office, 2013.

Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, Blakemore SJ, Dick

B, Ezeh AC and Patton GC.. Adolescence: a

foundation for future health. Lancet

;379(9826):1630-40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-

(12)60072-5 [published Online First:

Erosa A, Fuster L, Kambourov G and Rogerson R. Hours,

Occupations, and Gender Differences in Labor

Market Outcomes. NBER Working Paper 23636.

Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic

Research, 2017.

Women Count. Gender data gaps and country

performance: Democratic Republic of Congo New

York, NY: UN Women,; 2021 [Available from:

https://data.unwomen.org/country/democraticrepublic-of-the-congo.

van der Gaag N, Heilman B, Gupta T, et al. State of the

World's Fathers: Unlocking the Power of Men's

Care. Washington, DC: Promundo-US, 2019.

Lupton B. Maintaining Masculinity: Men who do

‘Women's Work’. British Journal of Management

;11(s1):33-48. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.11.s1.4

Patton GC, Darmstadt GL, Petroni S and Sawyer SM. A

Gender Lens on the Health and Well-being of Young

Males. J Adolesc Health 2018;62(3s):S6-s8. doi:

1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.020

Moreau C, Li M, De Meyer S, Vu Manh L, Guiella G,

Acharya R, Bello B, Maina B and Mmari K..

Measuring gender norms about relationships in early

adolescence: Results from the global early

adolescent study. SSM - population health

;7:014-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.014

Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL and Ku LC. Problem behaviors

and masculinity ideology in adolescent males.

Adolescent problem behaviors: Issues and research.

Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,

Inc 1994:165-86.

Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their

influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender

and health. Social science & medicine (1982)

;50(10):1385-401. doi: 10.1016/s0277-

(99)00390-1

Dworkin SL, Fleming PJ and Colvin CJ. The promises and

limitations of gender-transformative health

programming with men: critical reflections from the

field. Cult Health Sex 2015;17 Suppl 2(sup2):S128-

S43. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2015.1035751

[published Online First: 2015/05/08]

Kågesten A and Chandra-Mouli V. Gender-transformative

programmes: implications for research and action.

The Lancet Global Health 2020;8(2):e159-e60. doi:

1016/S2214-109X(19)30528-5

Levy JK, Darmstadt GL, Ashby C, Quandt M, Halsey E,

Nagar A and Greene ME. Characteristics of

successful programmes targeting gender inequality

and restrictive gender norms for the health and

wellbeing of children, adolescents, and young

adults: a systematic review. The Lancet Global

Health 2020;8(2):e225-e36. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30495-4

Save the Children. Growing Up GREAT! Implementation

Guide. Washington, DC: Institute for Reproductive

Health, Georgetown University for the U.S. Agency

for International Development (USAID), 2020.

Johns Hopkins University. Global Early Adolescent Study

(GEAS) Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins School of

Public Health & the World Health Organization;

[Available from: https://www.geastudy.org/

accessed April 5, 2022.

StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College

Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2021.

Institute for Reproductive Health. Growing Up GREAT!

Shows Promise in Skills Development and Norms

Shifting After One Year. Washington, DC:

Georgetown University, 2021


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 768 times
PDF Download : 328 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.