Organizational related challenges in antenatal care service delivery in semi-urban healthcare facilities in Gauteng, South Africa

Livhuwani Tshivhase, Dzivhuluwani Mukwevho, Idah Moyo, Sophy M. Moloko

Abstract

Antenatal care is vital in improving pregnancy outcomes. It is a vehicle for assisting in the reduction of maternal mortality. For this to be realized, there is a need for antenatal care that is effective, acceptable, and accessible to the users. However, South Africa is faced with challenges that impact the utilization of the service. A descriptive phenomenological design was used to explore the challenges of pregnant women attending antenatal care at selected facilities in Gauteng Province. Data were collected from 14 purposefully selected participants through in-depth individual telephonic interviews. Data analysis was guided by the Colaizzi steps. Credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability measures were applied to ensure trustworthiness. Ethical principles were adhered to throughout the study. Three themes emerged: resources and Covid-19-related challenges, overwhelming logistical processes, and suggested recommendations for ANC improvement. Management should provide sufficient resources and counselling services for staff and prioritize antenatal care services. (Afr J Reprod Health 2022; 26[10]: 44-54).

Full Text:

PDF

References

World Health Organization. Recommendations of antenatal care positive pregnancy experience. 2016 From: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf

Kabul J, Ekabua K and Njoku C. Proposed framework for making focussed antenatal care services accessible: A review of the Nigerian setting. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011. DOI: 10.5402/2011/253964.

Ngxongo TS. Basic antenatal care approach to antenatal care service provision. In Selected Topics in Midwifery Care 2018 Nov 5. IntechOpen.

Lattof SR, Tunçalp Ö, Moran AC, Bucagu M, Chou D, Diaz T and Gülmezoglu AM. Developing measures for WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: a conceptual framework and scoping review. BMJ open. 2020 Mar 1;9(4): e024130.

Paina L, Vadrevu L, Hanifi SM, Akuze J, Rieder R, Chan KS and Peters DH. What is the role of community capabilities for maternal health? An exploration of community capabilities as determinants to institutional deliveries in Bangladesh, India, and Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(Suppl 7):61–71.

Sharma BB, Jones L, Loxton DJ, Booth D and Smith R. Systematic review of Community participation interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in rural South Asia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18:1–16.

Joe W, Perkins J, Kumar S, Rajpal S and Subramanian SV. Institutional delivery in India, 2004–14: unravelling the equity-enhancing contributions of the public sector. Health Policy Plan. 2018; 33:645–53.

Ali B, Dhillon P and Mohanty S. Inequalities in the utilization of maternal health care in the pre-and post-National Health Mission periods in India. J Biosoc Sci. 2019;52(2):198–212.

Downe S, Finlayson KW, Lawrie TA, Lewin SA, Glenton C, Rosenbaum S, Barreix M and Tunçalp Ö. Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) for guidelines: paper 1–Using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements. Health research policy and systems. 2019 Dec;17(1):1-2.

Mageda K and Mmbaga EJ. Prevalence and predictors of institutional delivery among pregnant mothers in Biharamulo district, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. The Pan Afr Med J. 2015; 21:51.

Nigatu, AM and Gelaye, KA. Factors associated with the preference of institutional delivery after antenatal care attendance in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res 19, 810 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4636-6.

McMillan, CR, Dansereau, E, Wallace, MCG,. Colombara DV, Palmisano EB, Johanns CK, Schaefer A, Ríos-Zertuche D, Zúñiga-Brenes P, Hernandez B and Iriarte E. Antenatal care as a means to increase participation in the continuum of maternal and child healthcare: an analysis of the poorest regions of four Mesoamérican countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019 Dec;19(1):1-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2207-9.

Balaam M-C, Akerjordet K, Lyberg A, Kaiser B, Schoening E, Fredriksen AM, Ensel A, Gouni O and Severinsson E. A qualitative review of migrant women’s perceptions of their needs and experiences related to pregnancy and childbirth. J Adv Nurs 2013;69(9):1919– 30.

Briscoe L, Lavender T and McGowan L. A concept analysis of women’s vulnerability during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. J Adv Nurs 2016;72 (10):2330–45.

McLeish J and Redshaw M. A qualitative study of volunteer doulas working alongside midwives at births in England: mothers’ and doulas’ experiences. Midwifery 2017; 56:53–60. 43.

Green JM, Renfrew MJ, Curtis P, Sibiya NM, Ngxongo TSP and Bhengu TJ. Access and utilization of antenatal care services in a rural community of eThekwini district in KwaZulu-Natal. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 2018, 8 1-7, ISSN 2214-1391, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2018.01.002

Ellis P. Evidence-based practice in nursing. Learning Matters. 2019.

Autos SB. Phenomenology: A philosophy and method of inquiry. Journal of Education and Educational Development,2018; 5(1), 215-222.

Department of Health. Guidelines for maternity care in South Africa: A manual for clinics, community health centres and district hospitals. (4 ed). Pretoria: Government Printers. 2016.

Polit DF and Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research (9th ed.). China. Wolters Kluwer. 2018.

Shosha GA. Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: A reflection of a researcher. European Scientific Journal, 2012; 8(27).

Giorgi A. Reflections on certain qualitative and phenomenological psychological methods. University Professors Press. 2020.

DeJonckheere M and Vaughn LM. Semi-structured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigor. Family Medicine and Community Health, 2019; 7(2).

Beck CT. Introduction to phenomenology: Focus on methodology. SAGE Publications. 2019.

Korstjens I and Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 2018; 24(1), 120-124.

Drigo L, Luvhengo M., Lebese RT and Makhado L. Attitudes of pregnant women towards antenatal care services provided in primary health care facilities of Mbombela municipality, Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Public health journal. 2020 From: https://openpublicheathjournal.com.

Phommachanh S, Essink DR, Jansen M, Broerse JEW, Wright P and Mayxay M. Improvement of quality of antenatal care service provision at the public health facility in Lao PDR. BMC pregnancy and childbirth.2019; From: https://doi.org/101186/s12884-019-2345-0.

Mahiti GR, Mkoka DA, Kwara AD, Mbekenga CK, Hurtig A and Goicolea I. Women’s perceptions of antenatal, delivery, and postpartum services in rural Tanzania. Global Health Action 2015. 8:1, DOI: 10.3402/gha. v8.28567.

Zitha E and Mokgatle MM., Women’s view of responses to maternity services rendered during labour and childbirth in maternity units in a semi-rural district in South Africa. MDPI.2020; From: www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Malakoane B, Heunis JC, Chikobvu P, Kigozi NG and Kruger WH. Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: a situation appraisal to inform health system strengthening. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4862-y

Maphumulo TW and Bhengu BR. Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid. Curationis. 2019; From: http://www.curationis.org.za

Mbunge E. Effects of covid-19 in South African health system and society.2020; From: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.09.016

Mutsha tshi TE, Mothiba TM, Mamogobo PM and Mbombi MO. Record-keeping: Challenges experienced by nurses in selected public hospitals. Curationis. 2018 Jan 30;41(1):1-6.

Bwalya BC, Baboo KS and Sitali DC. Experiences of antenatal care among pregnant adolescents at Kanyama and Matero clinics in Lusaka district.2018 2018; From: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0565-9 (accessed 09 November 2019).

Gong E, Dula J, Alberto C, Albuquerque A, Steenland M, Fernandes Q, Cuco RM and Chicumbe S. Client experiences with antenatal care waiting times. BMC Health service research. 2019, From: https://doi.org/10.1186/12913-019-4369-6 (accessed 09 November 2019)

Miltenburg AS, Van der Eem L, Nyanza EC, Van Pelt S, Ndaki P, Basinda N and Sundby J. Antenatal care and opportunities for quality improvement of service provision in resource-limited setting. PloS one. 2017; From: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188279

Marsland H, Meza G, De Wildt G and Jones L. Exploration of women’s experiences of antenatal and intrapartum care. Plos|one. 2019; From: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209736 (accessed 11 April 2019)

Wali RM, Alqahtani RM, Alharazi SK, Bukhari SA and Quqandi SM., Patient satisfaction with the implementation of electronic medical records in the western region Saudi Arabia.BMC.2020; From: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-1099-0

John R, Ziegler S, Nost S, Gewalt S C, Strabner C and Bozorgmerhr K, Early evaluation of experiences of health care providers in reception centres with patient-held personal health records for asylum seekers. BMC.2019; From: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0394-1.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.