Social Networks and Decision Making for Clandestine Unsafe Abortions: Evidence from Kenya

Joachim Osur, Alloys Orago, Isaac Mwanzo, Elizabeth Bukusi

Abstract

Little is known about the role of social networks in promoting clandestine abortions. This study investigated the role social networks play in decision making for and facilitation of clandestine abortions. It was a mixed method study in which 320 women treated for complications of unsafe abortions were interviewed in a cross sectional survey to determine their consultation with social networks and how this ended up in clandestine abortions. Information obtained was supplemented with information from focus group discussions, case studies and key informant interviews. It was found that 95% of women consulted their social networks as part of decision making before aborting clandestinely and unsafely. The man responsible for pregnancy, friend of same sex and woman’s mother were the most consulted at 64%, 32% and 23% respectively.  92% of advice was for the woman to abort. The man responsible for pregnancy and the woman’s mother were the most influential advisors (p˂0.05). Intermediaries linked the woman to clandestine and unsafe abortion and included agents and previous clients of clandestine abortion providers and the woman’s friends and relatives. Decision making and seeking for clandestine abortion were therefore found to be shared responsibilities. It is recommended that programs for reducing unsafe abortions be designed with this fact in mind. (Afr J Reprod Health 2015; 19[1]: 34-43).

Full Text:

PDF

References

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics and ICF Macro. (2010) Kenya Demographic and Health Survey: 200809. Calverton, Maryland: KNBS and ICF Macro 2. World Health Organization. (2010) Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008. Geneva: WHO Press. 3. World Health Organization. (2011) Unsafe abortion. Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. 6thed. Geneva: WHO Press. 4. Singh S. (2006) Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet 368:1887-92. 5. Grimes A. (2003) Unsafe abortion: The silent scourge. Br Med Bull 67:99-113.

Singh S, Wulf D, Hussain R, Bankole A and Sedgh G. (2009) Abortion worldwide: A decade of uneven progress. New York: Guttmacher Institute. 7. Kenya Penal Code. (1973) Sections 158-160, 214 and 240. 8. Kenya Constitution (2010). Chapter 4 part 2 Art. 26(4). Available at:http://www.kenyaembassy.com/pdfs/ The%20Constitution%20of%20Kenya.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2012. 9. Cross R., Borgatti S., Parker A., (2001) Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network, Social Networks 23 (2001) 215–235 10. Nyanzi S., Nyanzi B. and Bessie K. (2005); "Abortion? That's for Women!" Narratives and Experiences of Commercial Motorbike Riders in South-Western Uganda; African Journal of Reproductive Health Vol. 9, No. 1 (Apr., 2005), pp. 142-161 11. Svanemyr J., Sundby J. (2007); The social context of induced abortions among young couples in Côte d'Ivoire, accessed online at http://reference.sabinet. co.za/sa_epublication_article/ajrh_v11_n2_a2 12. Izgbara C. (2005), The Socio-Cultural Context of Adolescents’ Notions of Sex and Sexuality in Rural South-Eastern Nigeria Accessed online at http://sexualities.sagepub.com/content/8/5/600.short 13. Plummer M., Wamoyi J., Nyalali K., Mshana G., (2008); Aborting and Suspending Pregnancy in Rural Tanzania: An Ethnography of Young People's Beliefs and Practices, Accessed online at http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.17284465.2008 .00175.x/abstract 14. Anderson R. and Neuman J. F., (1975), Societal and Individual Determinants of Medical Care in the United States, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 51:95-124 15. Ajzen, I. (1991), The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, p. 179-211. 16. Good C. M., (1987),Ethnomedical Systems in Africa, New York; the Guilford Press 17. Colman S., Ted J. (2009), Minor’s behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortions untill age 18, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol 41, No. 2 Jun 2009 18. Kumar U.,Baraitser P., Morton S., Massil H. (2004),Decision making and referral prior to abortion: a qualitative study of women’s experiences, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Healthcare 2004, 30(1): 51-54 19. Gebreselessie H., Levondsky B., Hawa P., (2010),Abortion in Malawi: Results of a study of incidence and magnitude of complications, Draft report presented to the Ministry of Health. 20. Cross R., Borgatti S., Parker A., (2001) Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network, Social Networks 23 (2001) 215–235 21. Arai L., (2007), Peer and neighborhood influences on teenage pregnancy and fertility: Qualitative findings from research in English communities, Health & Place 13 (2007) 87–98.

Osur et al. Social Networks and Unsafe Abortion

African Journal of Reproductive Health March 2015; 19 (1): 43

Matyastik B., Karen S., Wampler (2008): Daughters' attitudes toward sexuality; a qualitative study of

southern baptist mothers' and their daughters Journal of Adolescent Research 2008; 23; 31

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.