Legal and Ethical Considerations during Maternal Death Surveillance and Response

Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Eugene Justine Kongnyuy


Maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) is a promising strategy, to identify record and track key drivers of maternal deaths. Despite its potential in reducing maternal mortality, ethical and legal challenges need to be properly ascertained and acted upon, to guarantee its acceptability, sustainability, and effectiveness. This paper proposes a legal and ethical framework to guide practitioners and researchers through the MDSR process. Three (03) categories of both legal and ethical issues are discussed: namely the issues related to data, people and use of findings. Most challenges of the MDSR strategy have ethical and legal underappraisal origins, the most outstanding being the low maternal death notification rates. Efforts should be made for respondents to properly understand the rationale for the process, and how the data obtained will be put into use. Dispelling fears of possible litigation remains fundamental in obtaining quality data. Health care providers involved in the process need to understand their ethical and legal responsibilities, as well as privileges (legal protection). It is hoped that this framework will offer a structure to guide professionals in improving MDSR implementation and research.(Afr J Reprod Health 2018; 22[2]:17-25).

Full Text:



WHO | Maternal mortality [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 16]. Available from:

WHO | Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Technical Guidance. Information for Action to Prevent Maternal Death. WHO. Accessed July 16, 2016.

Hounton S, De Bernis L, Hussein J, Graham WJ, Danel I, Byass P and Mason EM. Towards elimination of maternal deaths: maternal deaths surveillance and response. Reprod Health. 2013 Jan 2;10:1.

Programme of action of the International Conference on Population and Development. paragraph 7.3. New York: United Nations; 1994.

Gruskin S, Cottingham J, Hilber AM, Kismodi E, Lincetto O and Roseman MJ. Using human rights to improve maternal and neonatal health: history, connections and a proposed practical approach. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Aug;86(8):589–93.

Amzat J. The question of autonomy in maternal health in Africa: a rights-based consideration. J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Jun;12(2):283–93.

WHO | Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015. WHO. Accessed July 16, 2016.

Kongnyuy EJ and van den Broek N. The difficulties of conducting maternal death reviews in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:42.

Gao Y, Kildea S, Barclay L, Hao M and Zeng W. Maternal mortality surveillance in an inland Chinese province. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Feb;104(2):128–31.

Eyal N. Using informed consent to save trust. J Med Ethics. 2014 Jul;40(7):437–44.

Bayley O, Chapota H, Kainja E, Phiri T, Gondwe C, King C, Nambiar B, Mwansambo C, Kazembe P, Costello A, Rosato M and Colbourn T. Community-linked maternal death review (CLMDR) to measure and prevent maternal mortality: a pilot study in rural Malawi. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 20;5(4):e007753.

Aborigo RA, Allotey P, Tindana P, Azongo D and Debpuur C. Cultural imperatives and the ethics of verbal autopsies in rural Ghana. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:18570.

Bueno de Mesquita J and Kismödi E. Maternal mortality and human rights: landmark decision by United Nations human rights body. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):79A.

Smith H, Ameh C, Godia P, Maua J, Bartilol K, Amoth P Mathai M and van den Broek N. Implementing Maternal Death Surveillance and Response in Kenya: Incremental Progress and Lessons Learned. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 27;5(3):345–54.

Smith H, Ameh C, Roos N, Mathai M and Broek NVD. Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017 Jul 17;17:233.

WHO | Beyond the numbers [Internet]. WHO. Available from:

Moodley J, Pattinson R, Fawcus S, Schoon M, Moran N, Shweni P and National Committee on Confidential Enquiries into MaternalDeaths in SouthAfrica . The confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in South Africa: a case study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2014 Sep 1;121:53–60.

Ameh CA, Smith H and van den Broek N. Maternal Death Surveillance and Response in Kenya. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Accessed: 10th of November, 2017

Bandali S, Thomas C, Hukin E, Matthews Z, Mathai M, Ramachandran Dilip T, Roos N, Lawley R, Igado Oand Hulton L. Maternal Death Surveillance and Response Systems in driving accountability and influencing change. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Dec 1;135(3):365–71.

Combs Thorsen V, Sundby J, Meguid T and Malata A. Easier said than done!: methodological challenges with conducting maternal death review research in Malawi. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 21;14:29.

CEDAW-C-KEN-CO-7.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2018 May 22]. Available from:

Bueno de Mesquita J and Kismödi E. Maternal mortality and human rights: landmark decision by United Nations human rights body. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):79-79A


  • There are currently no refbacks.