Opinions and practices of midwives working in the delivery rooms on informed consent in vaginal deliveries

Pervin Sahiner, Nevin Utkualp

Abstract

Obtaining informed consent from women for vaginal birth both safeguards their autonomy and establishes a legal foundation for midwives. This study aimed to determine the opinions and practices of midwives on obtaining valid informed consent for vaginal deliveries. This descriptive study was conducted between November 2021 and December 2022 in two different cities of Turkey, Bursa and Kocaeli. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test. In the study all midwives who had not received ethics training had a common perception that informed consent merely involved obtaining a signature and was a standard practice for vaginal birth (p=0.002). In the study, 92.9% of the midwives reported that they found it necessary to obtain informed consent in vaginal deliveries, 97.6% reported that they provided verbal information. However, information provided by midwives for valid informed consent was mostly not comprehensive (range 44.4%-80.2%). Most midwives (80.2%) focused on highlighting the benefits of vaginal birth for mothers, with comparatively less emphasis on communicating information regarding the potential risks and complications associated with vaginal birth for newborns. The high percentage of midwives who considered it necessary to obtain informed consent in vaginal deliveries in our study suggests that these midwives are well aware of the significance of informed consent. (Afr J Reprod Health 2023; 27 [11]: 18-25).

Full Text:

PDF

References

Karim MA, Ahmed I, Ferdous J, Islam BZ, Tegegne HA and

Aktar B. Assessing informed consent practices

during normal vaginal delivery and immediate

postpartum care in tertiary-level hospitals of

Banglades. Eur J Midwifery 2019;3(10):1-5.

Kırılmaz H and Ulusinan E. Caesarian in the framework of

medical ethics, Turkish Journal of Bioethics 2021;8

(2): 114-125.

Başkaya Y and Sayıner FD. Evidence-Based Midwifery

Practices to Reduce Cesarean Rate. HSP

;5(1):113-119.

Ministıry of health. patient treatment institutions

directorate. 1983.

https://khgmstokyonetimidb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/1

/0/yatakli-tedavi-kurumlari-isletmeyonetmeligi-13011983-tarihli-17927-sayili-resmigazete-kopyapdf.pdf date of access: 05.06.2021

Dietz HP and Callaghan S. Response to Vaginal delivery:

An argument against requiring consent. Aust N Z J

Obstet Gynaecol 2019;(59):165.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Obtaining valid consent clinical governance. Advice

No. 6 January 2015.

https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/pndfv5qf/cga6.pdf

(date of accessed 12 Octamber 2021).

Ukke GG, Gurara MK and Boynito WG. Disrespect and

abuse of women during childbirth in public health

facilities in Arba Minch town, south Ethiopia – a

cross-sectional study. Plos One 2019; April 29:1-17.

Valente EP, Mariani, I, Covi B and Lazzerini M. Quality of

informed consent practices around the time of

childbirth: A crosssectional study in Italy. Int. J.

Environ. Res. Public Health 2022; 19(7):1-13).

Wolf AB and Charles S. Childbirth is not an emergency:

Informed consent in labor and delivery. IJFAB:

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to

Bioethics 2018; 11(1):23-43.

Chen SW, Hutchinson AM, Nagle C and Bucknall TK.

Women’s decision-making processes and the

influences on their mode of birth following a

previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative

study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2018; 18(31)

:1-13.

Moridi M, Pazandeh F, Hajian S and Potrata B. Midwives'

perspectives of respectful maternity care during

childbirth: a qualitative study. PLoS

One2020;(9);15(3):1-12.

Ozdemir S and Aydin Er R. The evaluation of ethics

education in midwifery undergraduate programs in

Turkey. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2022; 9(1):66-72.

Oztürk M, Alan S and Kadıoğlu S. Ethical issues in the

delivery room: a field study Cukurova Med J 2019;

(1):183-194.

Department of Health. Reference guide to consent for

examination or treatment 2020. Secondedition,

cited2018April]Availablfrom:https://assets.publishi

ng.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uplo

ads/attachment_data/file/138296/dh1036531pd.(dat

e of access: 08 Septamber 2022)

Ergin A, Özcan M and Ağ SD. The compassion levels of

midwives working in the delivery room. Nursing

Ethics 2016; 27(3): 887–897.

Beauchamp TL and Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical

Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: United Kingdom

Press,2013,p.459.

Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R and Schillinger D.

Interventions to improve patient comprehension in

informed consent for medical and surgical

procedures: A systematic review. Med Decis

Making 2011; 31(1):151–173.

Hadımlı A, Çakır Koçak Y, Şener AG and Üredi N. The

difficulties in communication of midwifery students

with refugee women during clinical practices.

Journal of Adnan Menderes University Health

Sciences Faculty 2022; 6(1):1-9.

Kırca N. Opinions of nurses and midwives working in the

obstetrics clinic regarding the difficulties

experienced while giving care to the patients in the

postpartum period: qualitative study. Ordu University J Nurs Stud 2020;3(2):59-71.

Bakker W, Zethof S, Nansongole F, Kilowe K, Roosmalen

JV and Akker TVD. Health workers’ perspectives on informed consent for caesarean section in

Southern Malawi. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22(33):

-11.

Cook AM. Midwifery perspectives: The consent process in

the context of patient safety and medico-legal issues.

Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management

;22(1-2):25-29.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.