|
|
Editorial
¯
Attaining MDG 5 in northern Nigeria: Need to focus
on skilled birth attendance
Ezeanochie MC, Olagbuji BN, Agholor KN, Okonofua FE*
The
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University
of Benin and University of Benin Teaching Hospital,
Benin City, Nigeria.
*For
correspondence:
Okonofua FE. E-mail:
feokonofua@yahoo.co.uk
African Journal of Reproductive Health,
June 2010; 14[2]:
9-11
Nigeria’s maternal mortality ratio remains at an
unacceptably high level and is considered to be one of
the highest in the developing world1. The
most recent Nigerian National Demographic and Health
survey (NDHS)2 reported maternal mortality
ratio to be 545 / 100,000 live births. The data showed
wide regional disparity in maternal mortality ratios
between the different geopolitical zones of the country2.
The report showed that average maternal mortality ratio
in northern Nigeria was 2420 (range:1060 - 4477) per
100,000 live births4,5,6,7, while similar
data in the sou-thern parts of the country were
considerably lower - between 454 and 772/100,000 live
births8,9. There is increasing evidence that
this difference in maternal mortality between the
northern and southern parts of the coun-try may be due
to disparity in the accessibility and utilisation of
health services, especially differences in the
availability of skilled birth attendants between the
regions.
The WHO defines a skilled birth atten-dant (SBA) ’’as an
accredited health profess-sional- such as a midwife,
doctor or nurse- who has been educated and trained to
pro-ficiency in the skills needed to manage
un-complicated pregnancies, childbirth and the immediate
post natal period and in the identi-fication, management
and referral of compli-cations in women or newborns’’10.
The avai-lability of SBAs at delivery was one of the key
indicators identified for monitoring pro-gress towards
attainment of MDG 5. To en-sure skilled attendants at
birth for all women, the international community set a
target of 80% by 2005, 85% by 2010 and 90% cover-age by
2015. To date, whilst developed countries have attained
near universal cover-age (>99%) of SBAs, just slightly
over 50% of all births in developing countries take
place under the supervision of a SBA11. In
Nigeria, the 2008 NDHS reports an overall coverage of
39% for SBAs at delivery. Again, the data showed
remarkable regional differ-ences in this indicator
within the country. While 81.8% and 76.5% of births were
atten-ded by SBAs in the southeast and southwest regions
respectively, only15.5% in the north-east and 9.8% in
the northwest regions of the country were attended by
skilled providers2.
Available data indicate that the regions of the world
with dramatic gains in the propor-tion of deliveries
attended by SBAs since the millennium declaration
recorded more reduc-tions in maternal mortality ratios12,13.
Specifi-cally, a 50% reduction in the maternal
morta-lity ratio was observed in Egypt following the
doubling of the proportion of deliveries atten-ded by
skilled attendants12. In comparison, Nigeria
with no substantial increase in the number of deliveries
attended by SBAs over the same period, did not record
any remark-able change in the high maternal mortality
ratio. This lack of access to SBAs, especially in
northern Nigeria are due to various socio-economic and
cultural factors, including low educational level, young
maternal age, igno-rance, rural residence and high rate
of pover-ty. These reasons are further buttressed by
data from the NDHS which reports that the proportion of
women with no formal educa-tion in the southeast and
southwest geo-political zones were 6.3% and 6.0%
respec-tively, compared to 68.1% and 74.3% of wo-men in
the northeast and northwest regions2. The
data also showed that only 8% of wo-men from the poorest
20% of families deliver in a healthcare facility
compared to 86% of women from the richest 20% of
families. This is the largest equity gap on the
continent, and possibly in the world, and provides fur-ther
evidence that inadequate means of live-lihood and
poverty are critical factors asso-ciated with poor
utilization of evidence-based maternal and child health
services in Nigeria. Consequently any program designed
to imp-rove women’s access to skilled attendants at
birth must address these barriers if such pro-grams are
to achieve their intended objec-tives.
This edition of the African Journal of Re-productive
Health (AJRH) features three ori-ginal articles that
report the low utilisation of SBAs in Northern Nigeria
and the challenges this poses for progress in achieving
MDG 5 in the region. The first article was a
popu-lation-based study random survey of 6,809 women in
northern Nigeria, which showed a high rate of
utilisation of unskilled birth atten-dants14.
In particular, the data showed that unskilled birth
attendants were more likely to deliver low quality
maternity care as compa-red to skilled health workers.
This corrobo-rates the findings from the 2008 NDHS, and
suggests that if the trend continues attaining the MDG 5
in northern Nigeria would be a nightmare. The second
paper by Dalyop et al15 also demonstrates
similar results of high use of unskilled birth
attendants in north-cen-tral Nigeria, and its negative
effects on ma-ternal health. The third paper reports the
re-sults of a study that identify poor referral
practices by traditional birth attendants in
north-central Nigeria, and its negative conse-quences
for maternal health indicators16.
Clearly, there is a need to focus on pro-moting
increased access to skilled birth att-endance as a
principal strategy for achieving a reduction in maternal
mortality in northern Nigeria. Hopefully, the ‘Midwives
Service Scheme’ (MSS) recently launched by the Federal
Ministry of Health to increase skilled attendance at
birth, will likely achieve some beneficial effects in
reducing maternal morta-lity in states with low
percentage of skilled birth attendance13. The
scheme seeks to mo-bilise midwives, especially newly
qualified midwives, to health facilities in rural
commu-nities to undertake a one year community service.
The MSS is therefore set to address the human resource
need for skilled atten-dance at the primary level of
care as the ma-jority of Nigeria’s obstetric population
reside in the rural area17.
While the presence of a health worker with midwifery
skills at every birth is one of the most important
interventions for attaining safe motherhood, there is
the additional need to address major operational
challenges in the delivery of maternal health care.
These include the recruitment, mobilisation and
distribution of adequate numbers of midwives to all
parts of the country, ensuring equitable distribution to
communities where they are most needed, addressing the
issues of mo-rale and motivation while providing an enab-ling
environment with availability of essential supplies and
equipment. Also, there is the need to back up the
program with expanded emergency obstetric care
facilities, including the provision of effective
transportation, an organized referral system, and link
up of the participating health centres to secondary
health care centres that have facilities for operative
delivery. Additionally, community involvement and
participation as key stake-holders is essential to the
initiation and sus-tenance of an effective partnership
needed for the attainment of the specific objectives of
the policy. For example, in Thailand, some of these
barriers were circumvented through the use of home town
deployments of mid-wives, general development of rural
areas and career development incentives18,19.
In conclusion, a substantial number of women in northern
Nigeria still patronise un-skilled birth attendants.
Ensuring large scale access to SBAs during pregnancy and
deli-very is crucial in accelerating progress to-wards
the attainment of MDG 5, as available evidence has shown
that when the number of midwives increases, the number
of women who die decreases. While MSS is a step in the
right direction, what is required to achi-eve the
program objectives is to ensure ade-quate coverage,
provision of an enabling environment with proper
supervision and ap-propriate motivation, community
participation and above all the political will to ensure
sus-tainability
and continuity of the program.
REFERENCES
1.
Harrison KH. The Struggle to Reduce High Maternal
Mortality in Nigeria. Afr. J. Reprod. Health.
2009; 13(3):9-20.
2.
National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF
Macro. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008.
Abuja, Nigeria: National Population Commission and ICF
Macro. 2009.
3.
Tukur
J, Jido TA, Awolaja BS. Maternal mortality in rural
northern Nigeria. Trop Doct. 2008; 38(1):35-6.
4.
Ujah
IA, Aisien OA, Mutihir JT, Vanderjagt DJ, Glew RH, Uguru
VE. Factors contributing to maternal mortality in
north-central Nigeria: a seventeen year review.
Afr J Reprod Health.
2005; 9(3):27-40.
5.
Ochejele S, Enegela J, Heywood A. Assessment of quality
of emergency obstetrics care at the Federal Medical
Centre, Makurdi, Nigeria. Trop. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
2004; 21:160-3.
6.
Yusuf MA, Hamisu MS, Nalini SK, Greg RA.
Maternal mortality in Northern Nigeria: A population
based study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol.
2003; 109:153-7.
7.
Yusuf MA. Pattern of
maternal morbidity and mortality in Kano state: A
geographical analysis. J Soc Mgt Science. 9 (special
edition) 2005; 196-21.
8.
Onakewhor JU, Gharoro
EP: Changing trends in maternal mortality in a
developing country. Nig. J. Clin. Pract. 2008;
11(2):111-20.
9.
Onah HE,
Okaro JM,
Umeh U,
Chigbu CO. Maternal mortality in health
institutions with emergency obstetric care facilities in
Enugu State. Nig.
J
Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 25(6):569-74.
10.
UNFPA.
Consensus and concerns. Regional Work-shop on Skilled
Birth Attendants in South and West Asia. Pakistan;
UNFPA country Office; 2004; 3.
11.
Stanton C, Blanc A,
Croft T, Choi Y. Skilled care at birth in the developing
world: Progress to date and strategies for expanding
coverage. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2007; 39:109-120.
12.
The world health
report 2005 – Make every mother and child count. Geneva,
World Health Organiza-tion 2005 (http://www.who.int/whr/2005/en,
acces-sed 14 August 2008).
13.
United Nations. The
Millennium Development Goals Report 2006. United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, DESA. 2006.
14.
Doctor HV, Dahiru T.
Utilization of non-skilled birth attendants in northern
Nigeria: A rough terrain to the health-related MDGs.
Afr. J. Rep. Health, 2010, p. 14
15.
Nyango DD, Mutihir
JT, Laabes EP, Kigbu JH, Buba M. Skilled attendance:
the key to progress in achieving MDG-5 in north central
Nigeria Afr. J. Rep. Health, 2010, p. 14.
16.
Abodunrin OL, Akande TM, Musa IO, Aderibigbe SA.
Determinants of referral practices of clients by
traditional birth attendants in Ilorin, north central
Nigeria. Afr. J. Rep. Health, 2010, 14: p
17.
Population Reference
Bureau. 2001 World Popula-tion Data Sheet. Washington,
DC: Population Refer-ence Bureau 2001. http://www.prb.org/Content/Navi-gationMenu/Other_reports/2000-2002/sheet4.html
18.
MoH Malawi Human
Resources in the Health Sector: Towards a Solution,
Lilongwe: Ministry of Health; 2004.
19.
Wibulpolprasert S,
Pengpaibon P. Integrated strate-gies to tackle the
inequitable distribution of doctors in Thailand: four
decades of experience. Hum. Res. Health. 2002
1:12. http://www.hu-manresour-ceshealth.com/content/1/1/12.
|